refactor(logs): name every logger after its module, and hold it there

25 literal names covered 34 modules. plex/client.py, plex/stream.py,
plex/subtitles.py, plex/sync.py and two Plex route modules all called themselves
`siftlode.plex`; downloads/pipeline.py called itself `siftlode.worker`;
routes/channels.py called itself `siftlode.api`. The `logger` column is in every
stored row so E22.6's console can filter on it, and so an operator can pin a level
to one part of the system — neither works when six modules share a name.

`logs.get_logger(__name__)` derives it: app/plex/sync.py -> siftlode.plex.sync.
One name per module, and it cannot drift from the file it sits in.
tests/test_logger_names.py pins the derivation, that everything stays under the
one `siftlode` tree the handler and the tests attach to, and that no module
hand-rolls a name again unless the line says why (`# logger-name-ok: <why>`).
Two do: get_logger's own call, and `siftlode.http`, which is named for the traffic
it carries rather than the module it lives in — it replaced uvicorn's access log
and is what an operator pins when they want request lines and nothing else.

app/scheduler.py called its logger `logger`; every other module calls it `log`.

ruff gains LOG, G, T20, TRY400, TRY401 and S112. Four findings cleared with them:
worker.py logged `str(exc)[:120]` where the traceback was the whole question, and
three prints/f-strings that are deliberate now say so on the line. S110 and BLE001
stay off until S3 — 23 handlers are outstanding and each is a judgement about one
of them; enabling the rules first would just mean 23 blanket noqas.

backend/app/logsink.py

@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ _LIMITS = {
     "exc": 32_000,
 }
 
-_log = logging.getLogger("siftlode.logsink")
+_log = logs.get_logger(__name__)
 
 
 def should_store(record: logging.LogRecord) -> bool:
@@ -254,8 +254,12 @@ class LogSink(logging.Handler):
             with self._bind.connect() as conn, logs.erasure_guard(), conn.begin():
                 conn.execute(insert(LogEvent), without_erased(rows))
         except Exception as exc:  # noqa: BLE001 — the database is down or refused the batch
-            print(
-                f"log sink: could not store {len(rows)} log events: {logs.redact_text(str(exc))[:300]}",
+            # noqa T201: the sink's OWN failure. A log call here would be handed to this sink,
+            # which is the thing that just failed — straight into a loop. stderr is the one way
+            # out that does not re-enter.
+            print(  # noqa: T201
+                f"log sink: could not store {len(rows)} log events: "
+                f"{logs.redact_text(str(exc))[:300]}",
                 file=sys.stderr,
             )
             return 0