feat(e10): let an ultrawide buy bigger cards instead of more of them

The viewport contract has two ends, and only the floor was enforced. An auto-fill grid
answers "more room" with more columns, never bigger ones, so it settles just above its
minimum column at any width: measured at 3440px, the feed laid out 11 columns of 264px.
A feed diluted across an ultrawide fails the contract as surely as a broken one at the
floor.

Multi-column feed views now carry a `maxCols`; past it the leftover width flows into
the items. At 3440: cards 11x264 -> 8x370, cardsSmall 15 -> 11x264 (still visibly the
dense card, and never as wide as cards gets), tiles 7 -> 6x498. Each cap is set so the
item tops out near 1.5x its own minCol, which is what keeps a view recognisably itself.

A cap can only bind ABOVE the width at which that many columns already fit, so it is a
pure ultrawide affordance — 1024, 1920 and 2560 lay out exactly as before. Verified in
the browser at all three widths and across all five views.

The Channels grid needs no cap: the page's own 96rem --content-mw already bounds it.

Also renames VirtualGrid's `maxCol` to `colMaxWidth`. It was never a column count — it
is the single-column reading-width cap — and `maxCol`/`maxCols` one letter apart is the
kind of drift that has bitten this repo before.

The column maths moves to ui/gridColumns.ts as a pure function so both ends of the
contract are unit-testable without a layout engine; the tests assert the cap's numbers,
that it never binds at the floor, and that the dense card cannot grow into the standard
one.

frontend/src/components/ChannelLayoutGrid.tsx

@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ export default function ChannelLayoutGrid<T>({
       items={rows}
       getKey={rowKey}
       minCol={spec.minCol}
-      maxCol={null}
+      colMaxWidth={null}
       rowEst={spec.rowEst}
       renderItem={renderCard}
     />