fix(api,ui): a refused write says why, wherever the refusal happens
Round 5 taught `notifyActionError` to discard a plain-string `detail` in favour
of the caller's translated fallback, because `req` leaves 403/404/429 to the
caller and those routes hand-write English. Three places did not get the
message.
**The demo account lost its explanation.** `require_human` refused with a plain
string, so from that commit on the shared demo account got its caller's generic
"couldn't do that" and no hint that the demo account was the reason — and the
gate is not backed by a UI gate everywhere: the comfort shelf has no `is_demo`
check, so the pin button is live and simply fails. A structured `{code: "demo"}`
and an `errors.demo` string in both locales. The two auth routes that hand-roll
the same check were swept with it.
**`ChatThread` carried a second copy of the contract.** It filtered 404/429
itself and then did `e.detail || t(…)`, the pre-fix order, so the central fix
could not reach it and "That member hasn't set up messaging yet." stayed English
under a Hungarian UI. It goes through the shared helper now, and a contract test
pins the remaining raw-`detail` consumers as an explicit SET — never a count —
so a new copy fails the gate instead of shipping. The five on that list are
inline surfaces (a form field's error line, a setup banner) and are deferred
with the ~60 backend routes whose details they print.
**The Plex "Add to playlist" dialog was still silent.** Same shape as the
collection editor round 5 fixed and the YouTube twin that already had the fix:
no catch, so a playlist deleted on another device answered a structured 404 that
nothing reported — the tick never flipped, the gone row stayed, and the floating
promise became an unhandled rejection.
Also: the `ABORTED` sentinel's VALUE was asserted nowhere. The consumer test
hand-built the error it expected, so replacing `xhr.onabort`'s rejection with a
friendlier message left the lane green — and every upload the user cancels would
then raise a red "the upload failed" toast, which is what the sentinel prevents.
Both producer tests assert through `isAborted` now.
And two backend tests were pinning fewer sites than their own docstrings claimed:
the channel-404 loop said "all five" and issued three requests (explore and
subscribe unexercised, the excuse for subscribe naming a different call site
with a different reason slug), and the recipient/job test named three refusals
and requested two — `share_download`'s `not_found("recipient")` had no test in
the suite at all, nor did the locale keys added beside it. Every site named now
has a request behind it.
6 tests, mutation-checked against 7 mutations: the demo detail at both the gate
and an auth route, a re-hand-rolled ChatThread, the silent Plex dialog, the
abort sentinel, and each unpinned 404 — all red on the test that names them.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ def logout_others(
|
||||
are rejected, then re-stamp THIS cookie so the caller stays signed in. For "I left myself logged
|
||||
in somewhere" / a suspected session compromise. The demo account (shared) is excluded."""
|
||||
if user.is_demo:
|
||||
raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Not available in the demo account.")
|
||||
raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail={"code": "demo"})
|
||||
# Commit the bump BEFORE re-stamping this cookie, so a failed commit can't strand the current
|
||||
# session at a newer epoch than the DB (see set_password).
|
||||
bump_session_epoch(user)
|
||||
@@ -1293,7 +1293,7 @@ def set_password(
|
||||
account) needs no current password — the session already proves identity. Changing an
|
||||
existing one requires the current password, so a hijacked session can't silently rotate it."""
|
||||
if user.is_demo:
|
||||
raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Not available in the demo account.")
|
||||
raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail={"code": "demo"})
|
||||
new_password = body.password or ""
|
||||
if len(new_password) < PASSWORD_MIN_LEN:
|
||||
raise HTTPException(
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user