feat(auth): one mail, one click — the approval mail carries the confirmation link (E9.5 S6)

The funnel's common ordering made a person open TWO messages: one saying their access was approved,
another asking them to confirm their address. The approval mail now branches on what they actually
still have to do — carry the confirmation link, point at sign-in, or say a confirmation mail follows
once they register — so the usual case is one mail and one click. A mail that guesses wrong is worse
than a plain one: telling someone to sign in while their address is unconfirmed contradicts the
screen that will refuse them.

That embedded link lives 7 days rather than the usual 24 hours. Nobody sits waiting for an approval —
it can easily be read on Monday after a weekend, and an expired link spends the one-mail promise and
puts them back on two. The risk is small: the token only ever confirms an address; it signs nobody in
and sets no password.

The most likely root cause of the 2026-09-03 report that a confirmation mail "never arrived" is here
too, and it was never a delivery failure: re-registering an address that already had an unconfirmed
account returned in SILENCE — same cheerful "check your inbox", no mail sent at all. It now re-sends
the link. Nothing new leaks: the response and its timing are unchanged, and the public verify/resend
already does exactly this for the same input.

Whitelisting stays silent, and that is a decision, not an omission. The operator opens a door as a
possibility — usually already agreed with the person — and a row can sit approved for weeks with
nobody registering; a mail fired automatically there would be nudging someone who never asked.
Telling them is its own act on its own button, `invited_at` records it so a second click is a
decision rather than an accident, and the button only appears where nobody is behind the address yet:
"the door is open, come in" is meaningless to someone already inside.

Two things UAT caught that no test would have. Every fresh registration appeared in BOTH admin lists
at once, because the stuck-sign-ups filter keyed on "unconfirmed" — the rule is now "the address may
sign in, and this account still can't", which leaves an undecided request with the queue that owns
it. And the invitation button was offered on every approved row, half of which are existing users.

Also: the confirmation mail finally says what its link's rules are (once, 24 hours) — the reset mail
always has, while this one left the reader to discover both by meeting a dead link. The card's
"didn't get the email?" moves up under the form, and the three waiting messages name the spam folder,
which is where a first message to a fresh recipient sometimes lands.

Registration now records the language the sign-up page was in. Nothing reads it yet — the bilingual
templates are S7 — but it is the only moment that choice exists anywhere the server can see, and a
preference nobody recorded cannot be backfilled later.

UAT on localdev: re-registering re-sent the link (one token became two, one account); approval issued
a 7-day token and moved the account into the stuck list with only a re-send; whitelisting mailed
nobody; the invitation recorded itself and the row then warned that sending again would write twice.
Test data removed.
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-04 04:05:28 +02:00
parent 7acdf5d577
commit a76bab9b34
20 changed files with 687 additions and 47 deletions
+20 -5
View File
@@ -44,8 +44,9 @@ def test_a_pre_approved_registrant_is_listed_and_offers_activation(db, make_user
def test_an_ordinary_registrant_awaiting_a_decision_is_not_listed_twice(db, make_user, as_user):
# They already have a pending invite with Approve on it in the queue above. Two buttons for one
# person is worse than one.
# They already have a pending invite with Approve on it in the queue above, and their address is
# not allowed YET — the decision is the queue's to own. Caught in UAT on 2026-09-05: an earlier
# filter keyed on "unconfirmed" put every fresh registration in both lists at once.
admin = make_user(email="admin@example.com", role="admin")
db.add(Invite(email="normal@example.com", status="pending"))
db.commit()
@@ -54,6 +55,17 @@ def test_an_ordinary_registrant_awaiting_a_decision_is_not_listed_twice(db, make
assert "normal@example.com" not in _pending_access(as_user(admin))
def test_a_fresh_registration_stays_in_the_queue_and_out_of_this_list(db, make_user, as_user):
# The realistic version of the case above: a brand-new sign-up is inactive AND unconfirmed. It
# still belongs only to the queue — the admin's next act is the decision, not a re-send.
admin = make_user(email="admin@example.com", role="admin")
db.add(Invite(email="fresh@example.com", status="pending"))
db.commit()
make_user(email="fresh@example.com", password=_PW, is_active=False, email_verified=False)
assert "fresh@example.com" not in _pending_access(as_user(admin))
def test_activating_lets_them_in_and_is_recorded(db, make_user, as_user):
admin = make_user(email="admin@example.com", role="admin")
stuck = _stuck_registrant(db, make_user, admin)
@@ -116,12 +128,15 @@ def test_an_unconfirmed_account_is_listed_and_can_be_sent_a_fresh_link(
monkeypatch.setattr(admin_routes.email_mod, "email_enabled", lambda db=None: True)
sent: list[tuple[str, str]] = []
monkeypatch.setattr(
auth_routes.email_mod, "send_verify_email", lambda to, link: sent.append((to, link))
auth_routes.email_mod, "send_verify_email", lambda to, link, **kw: sent.append((to, link))
)
admin = make_user(email="admin@example.com", role="admin")
# Active but unconfirmed — a real state since E9.5 S1 made the two gates order-independent. It is
# not the admin's to decide, but the mail may simply never have arrived (2026-09-03: the first
# message to a fresh Gmail landed in Spam), so it is theirs to help with.
# not the admin's to decide, but the mail may simply never have arrived, so it is theirs to help
# with. The approved invite is what puts them on this screen at all: the list is "the address may
# sign in, this account still can't", so an undecided request stays with the queue that owns it.
db.add(Invite(email="unconfirmed@example.com", status="approved", decided_by=admin.email))
db.commit()
u = make_user(email="unconfirmed@example.com", password=_PW, email_verified=False)
assert "unconfirmed@example.com" in _pending_access(as_user(admin))
+3 -1
View File
@@ -320,7 +320,9 @@ def test_registration_of_a_pre_approved_email_persists_the_account_with_smtp(db,
sent: list[str] = []
monkeypatch.setattr(auth_mod.email_mod, "email_enabled", lambda: True)
monkeypatch.setattr(auth_mod.email_mod, "send_verify_email", lambda to, link: sent.append(to))
monkeypatch.setattr(
auth_mod.email_mod, "send_verify_email", lambda to, link, **kw: sent.append(to)
)
monkeypatch.setattr(auth_mod.email_mod, "send_admin_new_request", lambda admins, to: True)
db.add(Invite(email="rita@example.com", status="approved", decided_by="admin@example.com"))
db.commit()
+249
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
"""One mail, one click — the branching welcome/invitation mail (E9.5 S6), DB-lane.
The funnel's common ordering makes a person open TWO messages: one saying their access is approved,
another asking them to confirm their address. The C option carries the confirmation link inside the
mail that is already going out, so the usual case is one mail and one click.
Also here: the silent no-op that is the most likely explanation for the 2026-09-03 report that a
confirmation mail "never arrived". Re-registering an address that already had an unconfirmed account
sent nothing at all, while answering with the same cheerful "check your inbox".
"""
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
from sqlalchemy import select
from app.models import AuditLog, AuthToken, Invite, User
_PW = "correct horse battery"
def _capture(monkeypatch, name):
"""Record the arguments a given email_mod.send_* was called with."""
from app import email as email_mod
calls: list[tuple] = []
monkeypatch.setattr(email_mod, name, lambda *a, **kw: calls.append((a, kw)) or True)
return calls
def _smtp_on(monkeypatch):
from app import email as email_mod
monkeypatch.setattr(email_mod, "email_enabled", lambda db=None: True)
def _approve(client, invite_id):
r = client.post(f"/api/admin/invites/{invite_id}/approve")
assert r.status_code == 200
return r
# --- the approval mail branches ------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_an_unconfirmed_account_gets_the_confirmation_link_in_the_approval_mail(
db, make_user, as_user, monkeypatch
):
_smtp_on(monkeypatch)
sent = _capture(monkeypatch, "send_access_approved")
admin = make_user(email="admin@example.com", role="admin")
inv = Invite(email="waiting@example.com", status="pending")
db.add(inv)
db.commit()
make_user(email="waiting@example.com", password=_PW, email_verified=False, is_active=False)
_approve(as_user(admin), inv.id)
(email, link, has_account, hours), _ = sent[0]
assert email == "waiting@example.com" and has_account is True
assert link and "#verify=" in link
# The whole point: this is the ONLY message they now have to open.
assert hours == 24 * 7
def test_the_link_in_that_mail_actually_confirms_the_address(db, make_user, as_user, monkeypatch):
_smtp_on(monkeypatch)
sent = _capture(monkeypatch, "send_access_approved")
admin = make_user(email="admin@example.com", role="admin")
inv = Invite(email="waiting@example.com", status="pending")
db.add(inv)
db.commit()
user = make_user(
email="waiting@example.com", password=_PW, email_verified=False, is_active=False
)
_approve(as_user(admin), inv.id)
token = sent[0][0][1].split("#verify=")[1]
r = as_user(admin).post("/auth/verify", json={"token": token})
assert r.status_code == 200
db.expire_all()
assert db.get(User, user.id).email_verified is True
def test_that_link_outlives_a_weekend(db, make_user, as_user, monkeypatch):
# An approval is not a mail anyone sits waiting for; the standard 24h would routinely expire
# before it is read, and the one-mail promise with it.
_smtp_on(monkeypatch)
_capture(monkeypatch, "send_access_approved")
admin = make_user(email="admin@example.com", role="admin")
inv = Invite(email="waiting@example.com", status="pending")
db.add(inv)
db.commit()
user = make_user(
email="waiting@example.com", password=_PW, email_verified=False, is_active=False
)
_approve(as_user(admin), inv.id)
tok = db.execute(select(AuthToken).where(AuthToken.user_id == user.id)).scalars().all()[-1]
assert tok.expires_at > datetime.now(timezone.utc) + timedelta(days=6)
def test_an_already_confirmed_account_is_just_told_to_sign_in(db, make_user, as_user, monkeypatch):
_smtp_on(monkeypatch)
sent = _capture(monkeypatch, "send_access_approved")
admin = make_user(email="admin@example.com", role="admin")
inv = Invite(email="ready@example.com", status="pending")
db.add(inv)
db.commit()
make_user(email="ready@example.com", password=_PW, is_active=False)
_approve(as_user(admin), inv.id)
(_, link, has_account, _), _ = sent[0]
assert link is None and has_account is True # no link to offer, and none needed
def test_someone_with_no_account_yet_is_told_a_second_mail_is_coming(
db, make_user, as_user, monkeypatch
):
_smtp_on(monkeypatch)
sent = _capture(monkeypatch, "send_access_approved")
admin = make_user(email="admin@example.com", role="admin")
inv = Invite(email="stranger@example.com", status="pending")
db.add(inv)
db.commit()
_approve(as_user(admin), inv.id)
(_, link, has_account, _), _ = sent[0]
# Nothing to link to yet. Saying a confirmation mail follows is what makes its ABSENCE
# noticeable — the failure that went unnoticed on 2026-09-03.
assert link is None and has_account is False
# --- the deliberate invitation --------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_adding_an_address_to_the_whitelist_mails_nobody(db, make_user, as_user, monkeypatch):
_smtp_on(monkeypatch)
approved = _capture(monkeypatch, "send_access_approved")
invited = _capture(monkeypatch, "send_access_invitation")
admin = make_user(email="admin@example.com", role="admin")
r = as_user(admin).post("/api/admin/invites", json={"email": "maybe@example.com"})
# Whitelisting opens a door as a possibility — often already agreed in person — and an address
# can sit approved for weeks. A mail fired automatically here would be nudging someone who never
# asked to be nudged.
assert r.status_code == 200 and r.json()["invited_at"] is None
assert approved == [] and invited == []
def test_the_admin_can_then_invite_them_on_purpose(db, make_user, as_user, monkeypatch):
_smtp_on(monkeypatch)
invited = _capture(monkeypatch, "send_access_invitation")
admin = make_user(email="admin@example.com", role="admin")
inv = Invite(email="maybe@example.com", status="approved", decided_by=admin.email)
db.add(inv)
db.commit()
r = as_user(admin).post(f"/api/admin/invites/{inv.id}/invite")
assert r.status_code == 200 and r.json()["invited_at"] is not None
assert invited[0][0][0] == "maybe@example.com"
# Recorded on the row, so "did I already write to them?" has an answer where the decision is
# made — the wrong answer means mailing a real person twice.
db.expire_all()
assert db.get(Invite, inv.id).invited_at is not None
assert "invite_send" in db.execute(select(AuditLog.action)).scalars().all()
def test_an_undecided_request_cannot_be_invited(db, make_user, as_user, monkeypatch):
_smtp_on(monkeypatch)
admin = make_user(email="admin@example.com", role="admin")
inv = Invite(email="asking@example.com", status="pending")
db.add(inv)
db.commit()
r = as_user(admin).post(f"/api/admin/invites/{inv.id}/invite")
assert r.status_code == 409 and r.json()["detail"]["reason"] == "not_approved"
def test_the_invitation_says_so_when_the_instance_cannot_send_mail(
db, make_user, as_user, monkeypatch
):
from app import email as email_mod
monkeypatch.setattr(email_mod, "email_enabled", lambda db=None: False)
admin = make_user(email="admin@example.com", role="admin")
inv = Invite(email="maybe@example.com", status="approved", decided_by=admin.email)
db.add(inv)
db.commit()
r = as_user(admin).post(f"/api/admin/invites/{inv.id}/invite")
assert r.status_code == 409 and r.json()["detail"]["reason"] == "email_off"
db.expire_all()
assert db.get(Invite, inv.id).invited_at is None # nothing sent, nothing recorded
# --- the silent register no-op --------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_registering_again_re_sends_the_link_instead_of_sending_nothing(db, client, monkeypatch):
_smtp_on(monkeypatch)
sent = _capture(monkeypatch, "send_verify_email")
assert (
client.post(
"/auth/register", json={"email": "twice@example.com", "password": _PW}
).status_code
== 200
)
assert len(sent) == 1
r = client.post("/auth/register", json={"email": "twice@example.com", "password": _PW})
# The old behaviour was to return in silence: same cheerful "check your inbox", no mail. That is
# the most likely explanation for the 2026-09-03 confirmation mail that "never arrived" — none
# was ever sent. The response stays uniform; only the dead end is gone.
assert r.status_code == 200 and r.json() == {"status": "ok"}
assert len(sent) == 2
assert sent[1][0][0] == "twice@example.com"
def test_registering_again_does_not_create_a_second_account(db, client, monkeypatch):
_smtp_on(monkeypatch)
_capture(monkeypatch, "send_verify_email")
for _ in range(2):
client.post("/auth/register", json={"email": "twice@example.com", "password": _PW})
db.expire_all()
rows = db.execute(select(User).where(User.email == "twice@example.com")).scalars().all()
assert len(rows) == 1
def test_a_confirmed_account_still_gets_nothing(db, client, make_user, monkeypatch):
_smtp_on(monkeypatch)
sent = _capture(monkeypatch, "send_verify_email")
make_user(email="done@example.com", password=_PW) # already verified
r = client.post("/auth/register", json={"email": "done@example.com", "password": _PW})
# There is nothing to confirm, so there is nothing to send — and mailing "confirm your address"
# to someone who already did would be a lie.
assert r.status_code == 200
assert sent == []