feat(auth): one mail, one click — the approval mail carries the confirmation link (E9.5 S6)
The funnel's common ordering made a person open TWO messages: one saying their access was approved, another asking them to confirm their address. The approval mail now branches on what they actually still have to do — carry the confirmation link, point at sign-in, or say a confirmation mail follows once they register — so the usual case is one mail and one click. A mail that guesses wrong is worse than a plain one: telling someone to sign in while their address is unconfirmed contradicts the screen that will refuse them. That embedded link lives 7 days rather than the usual 24 hours. Nobody sits waiting for an approval — it can easily be read on Monday after a weekend, and an expired link spends the one-mail promise and puts them back on two. The risk is small: the token only ever confirms an address; it signs nobody in and sets no password. The most likely root cause of the 2026-09-03 report that a confirmation mail "never arrived" is here too, and it was never a delivery failure: re-registering an address that already had an unconfirmed account returned in SILENCE — same cheerful "check your inbox", no mail sent at all. It now re-sends the link. Nothing new leaks: the response and its timing are unchanged, and the public verify/resend already does exactly this for the same input. Whitelisting stays silent, and that is a decision, not an omission. The operator opens a door as a possibility — usually already agreed with the person — and a row can sit approved for weeks with nobody registering; a mail fired automatically there would be nudging someone who never asked. Telling them is its own act on its own button, `invited_at` records it so a second click is a decision rather than an accident, and the button only appears where nobody is behind the address yet: "the door is open, come in" is meaningless to someone already inside. Two things UAT caught that no test would have. Every fresh registration appeared in BOTH admin lists at once, because the stuck-sign-ups filter keyed on "unconfirmed" — the rule is now "the address may sign in, and this account still can't", which leaves an undecided request with the queue that owns it. And the invitation button was offered on every approved row, half of which are existing users. Also: the confirmation mail finally says what its link's rules are (once, 24 hours) — the reset mail always has, while this one left the reader to discover both by meeting a dead link. The card's "didn't get the email?" moves up under the form, and the three waiting messages name the spam folder, which is where a first message to a fresh recipient sometimes lands. Registration now records the language the sign-up page was in. Nothing reads it yet — the bilingual templates are S7 — but it is the only moment that choice exists anywhere the server can see, and a preference nobody recorded cannot be backfilled later. UAT on localdev: re-registering re-sent the link (one token became two, one account); approval issued a 7-day token and moved the account into the stuck list with only a re-send; whitelisting mailed nobody; the invitation recorded itself and the row then warned that sending again would write twice. Test data removed.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -44,8 +44,9 @@ def test_a_pre_approved_registrant_is_listed_and_offers_activation(db, make_user
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_an_ordinary_registrant_awaiting_a_decision_is_not_listed_twice(db, make_user, as_user):
|
||||
# They already have a pending invite with Approve on it in the queue above. Two buttons for one
|
||||
# person is worse than one.
|
||||
# They already have a pending invite with Approve on it in the queue above, and their address is
|
||||
# not allowed YET — the decision is the queue's to own. Caught in UAT on 2026-09-05: an earlier
|
||||
# filter keyed on "unconfirmed" put every fresh registration in both lists at once.
|
||||
admin = make_user(email="admin@example.com", role="admin")
|
||||
db.add(Invite(email="normal@example.com", status="pending"))
|
||||
db.commit()
|
||||
@@ -54,6 +55,17 @@ def test_an_ordinary_registrant_awaiting_a_decision_is_not_listed_twice(db, make
|
||||
assert "normal@example.com" not in _pending_access(as_user(admin))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_a_fresh_registration_stays_in_the_queue_and_out_of_this_list(db, make_user, as_user):
|
||||
# The realistic version of the case above: a brand-new sign-up is inactive AND unconfirmed. It
|
||||
# still belongs only to the queue — the admin's next act is the decision, not a re-send.
|
||||
admin = make_user(email="admin@example.com", role="admin")
|
||||
db.add(Invite(email="fresh@example.com", status="pending"))
|
||||
db.commit()
|
||||
make_user(email="fresh@example.com", password=_PW, is_active=False, email_verified=False)
|
||||
|
||||
assert "fresh@example.com" not in _pending_access(as_user(admin))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_activating_lets_them_in_and_is_recorded(db, make_user, as_user):
|
||||
admin = make_user(email="admin@example.com", role="admin")
|
||||
stuck = _stuck_registrant(db, make_user, admin)
|
||||
@@ -116,12 +128,15 @@ def test_an_unconfirmed_account_is_listed_and_can_be_sent_a_fresh_link(
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(admin_routes.email_mod, "email_enabled", lambda db=None: True)
|
||||
sent: list[tuple[str, str]] = []
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(
|
||||
auth_routes.email_mod, "send_verify_email", lambda to, link: sent.append((to, link))
|
||||
auth_routes.email_mod, "send_verify_email", lambda to, link, **kw: sent.append((to, link))
|
||||
)
|
||||
admin = make_user(email="admin@example.com", role="admin")
|
||||
# Active but unconfirmed — a real state since E9.5 S1 made the two gates order-independent. It is
|
||||
# not the admin's to decide, but the mail may simply never have arrived (2026-09-03: the first
|
||||
# message to a fresh Gmail landed in Spam), so it is theirs to help with.
|
||||
# not the admin's to decide, but the mail may simply never have arrived, so it is theirs to help
|
||||
# with. The approved invite is what puts them on this screen at all: the list is "the address may
|
||||
# sign in, this account still can't", so an undecided request stays with the queue that owns it.
|
||||
db.add(Invite(email="unconfirmed@example.com", status="approved", decided_by=admin.email))
|
||||
db.commit()
|
||||
u = make_user(email="unconfirmed@example.com", password=_PW, email_verified=False)
|
||||
|
||||
assert "unconfirmed@example.com" in _pending_access(as_user(admin))
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user