refactor(core): the core's owner filters go through userscope, each held by a second account
Tokens, notifications, quota, debug sessions and the reset-link burn filtered their owner inline. Ten of the fifteen filters had no test that noticed one going missing; each now has a test where another account's rows must not count, show or change.
This commit is contained in:
+2
-1
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ from sqlalchemy import delete, func, select
|
||||
from sqlalchemy.orm import Session
|
||||
from starlette.requests import HTTPConnection
|
||||
|
||||
from app.userscope import owned_by
|
||||
from app import debugsession
|
||||
from app import email as email_mod
|
||||
from app import logs
|
||||
@@ -230,7 +231,7 @@ def purge_user(db: Session, user: User, background: BackgroundTasks) -> None:
|
||||
# request's access line, a queued row, a later background task would otherwise put rows back
|
||||
# under the id after this DELETE (logs.forget_user).
|
||||
logs.forget_user(user_id)
|
||||
db.execute(delete(LogEvent).where(LogEvent.user_id == user_id))
|
||||
db.execute(delete(LogEvent).where(owned_by(LogEvent.user_id, user_id)))
|
||||
# Every canonically-equal invite goes, not just the literal spelling: is_allowed matches on the
|
||||
# canonical form, so leaving a sibling row behind would keep granting access to a mailbox whose
|
||||
# account was just erased — and prod really does carry approved pairs for one mailbox.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user