refactor(downloads): split worker.py parent/child into pipeline.py + jobdb.py (E3 S2, B-sub-9)
worker.py (~1090 L) mixed the PARENT supervisor (claim + supervise + the process
loop) with the CHILD pipeline (the yt-dlp/ffmpeg download+edit that runs in the
spawned subprocess). Extract them:
worker.py 1090 -> 475 parent: claim/supervise/loop
downloads/pipeline.py (new 592) the child pipeline (_download/_process_edit +
hooks/progress/ffmpeg helpers + _Aborted)
downloads/jobdb.py (new 73) the short-lived-session helpers both sides
share (_set_job/_job_status/_touch_job/
_requeue_if_running/_reset_asset_pending +
the staging-dir paths)
The graph is one-directional (runner -> pipeline -> jobdb; worker -> jobdb; no
worker<->pipeline edge) — the parent never calls the child directly, it spawns
runner.py as a subprocess. Consumers rewired: runner import, and two tests follow
the moved symbols (_media_info/_produced_file -> pipeline; the ffmpeg-callback
patches target pipeline where the names are looked up).
Pure code motion, verbatim bodies. ruff clean, full lane 363 pass (unchanged).
This commit is contained in:
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ def main() -> None:
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
# Imported here (not at module top) so the child pays the yt-dlp import cost only when it has
|
||||
# real work, and to keep the import graph obvious: runner is a thin entry over worker's helpers.
|
||||
from app.worker import _download, _process_edit
|
||||
# real work, and to keep the import graph obvious: runner is a thin entry over the pipeline.
|
||||
from app.downloads.pipeline import _download, _process_edit
|
||||
|
||||
if job_kind == "edit":
|
||||
_process_edit(job_id, asset_id)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user