Files
siftlode/backend/app/refusal.py
T
peter 5e8589bbf8 fix(i18n): read every refusal from the backend's syntax tree, not by regex
The contract read Python with regexes, and each guard added for a missed shape had shapes of its own
it missed: a reason after another key, a status passed by name, a second `e.reason` handler with the
same text, a pin naming a type nothing checked.

backend/tests/refusal_sites.py (stdlib `ast`, run by the contract on the host's Python) reads every
`{"code": ...}` detail and follows each reason to its values: literals, both arms of a conditional,
module constants, the `Literal` on the parameter or attribute it travels in (on the class an `except`
catches), every call of a `str` helper with its defaults, a map's values with its keys held to the
index's type. What it cannot follow fails the contract, unless no screen shows that code; no pins.

The reason attributes are typed with their Literal, so a subclass or an assignment cannot widen
them; InvalidSetting takes a SettingReason, and the settings map is held to it (a reason the map
lacked was a 500). The per-family reverse checks are one check by prefix (the admin actions
included), and the leaf-key filter applies only to the suffixed sign-in family.
2026-10-31 15:07:38 +01:00

44 lines
2.5 KiB
Python

"""A request the app refuses, said in a way the UI can put in the reader's language.
Every refusal the API answers carries a structured `detail` — `{code, reason, …params}` — and the client
translates it (`lib/api/refusalText.ts` `localizeDetail`). A bare English string reached the Hungarian UI
verbatim: the blocking error dialog, and every inline surface that printed `HttpError.detail`, showed
whatever sentence the route happened to hand-write. `refused` is the generic family
(`errors.refused.<reason>`, the params interpolated into the sentence); the older specific codes
(`not_found`, `youtube`, `playlist`, the admin refusals, …) stay, since each is already translated.
A test (`test_http_details.py`) reads every `HTTPException` in the app and fails on a string detail.
`tests/refusal_sites.py` reads every `{"code": …}` detail from the syntax tree and follows each reason
to its values: a literal, a `Literal` type on the parameter or attribute it travels in, every call of
a helper like `refused` below, a map's values. The frontend's contract test
(`i18n/backendIds.contract.test.ts`) runs it and requires each code in one record of
`lib/api/refusalCodes.ts`, and each reason's sentence in both languages; a code or reason it cannot
follow fails it, unless no screen shows that code. So the rule is enforced, not described.
"""
from fastapi import HTTPException
from app.sysconfig import InvalidSetting, SettingReason
def refused(status: int, reason: str, **params: object) -> HTTPException:
"""The refusal to raise: `raise refused(409, "view_name_taken", name=name)`. `params` travel in
the detail for the sentence to interpolate (`{{name}}`); keep them to values the reader may see."""
return HTTPException(status_code=status, detail={"code": "refused", "reason": reason, **params})
# `sysconfig.InvalidSetting.reason` → the refusal it answers as. A dict of literals, so the refusal
# scan reads every reason this can produce, and holds its keys to `SettingReason`.
_SETTING_REASONS: dict[SettingReason, str] = {
"not_a_number": "setting_not_a_number",
"too_low": "setting_too_low",
"too_high": "setting_too_high",
"not_a_choice": "setting_not_a_choice",
"no_encryption_key": "no_encryption_key",
}
def setting_refused(exc: InvalidSetting) -> HTTPException:
"""A value the admin entered that `sysconfig.set_value` refused (`exc`: its `InvalidSetting`)."""
return refused(400, _SETTING_REASONS[exc.reason], key=exc.key, **exc.params)