Files
siftlode/backend/tests/test_download_limits.py
T
peter b1832afd18 style: apply ruff format across backend + scripts (line-length 100)
Mechanical, whole-tree `ruff format` pass — no behaviour change. Recorded in
.git-blame-ignore-revs (next commit) so git blame skips it.
2026-08-23 07:43:06 +02:00

172 lines
6.3 KiB
Python

"""DB-backed tests for R12 · S5 backend residue — the two download limits:
- **#2 claim fairness** (`worker._claim_job`): users already AT their per-user concurrency limit
are excluded IN THE SQL, so one user flooding the queue past the fetch window can't starve
everyone behind them. The old fixed `LIMIT 50` window did exactly that.
- **#3 list cap** (`routes.downloads.list_downloads` / `shared_with_me`): the per-user listings
are bounded so a heavy library can't return an unbounded result set.
Uses the `db` fixture (real Postgres) — skipped when no database is reachable. `_claim_job` runs in
its OWN session, so every test COMMITS its setup before calling it.
"""
from app.models import DownloadJob, DownloadQuota, MediaAsset, User
from app.worker import _claim_job
def _job(db, user_id, queue_pos, status="queued", asset_id=None):
j = DownloadJob(
user_id=user_id,
asset_id=asset_id,
source_kind="youtube",
source_ref="x" * 11,
status=status,
queue_pos=queue_pos,
profile_snapshot={},
)
db.add(j)
return j
def _asset(db, status, ref):
a = MediaAsset(source_kind="url", source_ref=ref, format_sig="s", status=status, ref_count=1)
db.add(a)
db.flush()
return a
def _quota(db, user_id, max_concurrent, unlimited=False):
db.add(
DownloadQuota(
user_id=user_id,
max_bytes=10**12,
max_concurrent=max_concurrent,
max_jobs=10**6,
unlimited=unlimited,
)
)
# --- #2 · claim fairness --------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_capped_user_flood_does_not_starve_users_behind_the_window(db):
a = User(email="flooder@example.com")
b = User(email="waiter@example.com")
db.add_all([a, b])
db.flush()
_quota(
db, a.id, max_concurrent=1
) # A: 1 concurrent, already running one -> all A's queued are ineligible
_quota(db, b.id, max_concurrent=3)
_job(db, a.id, queue_pos=0, status="running")
for i in range(1, 61): # A floods the FRONT with far more than the 50-row fetch window
_job(db, a.id, queue_pos=i)
bjob = _job(db, b.id, queue_pos=100) # B sits behind the flood
db.commit()
assert _claim_job() == bjob.id # B is served despite A's 60-job flood filling the old window
db.expire_all()
assert db.get(DownloadJob, bjob.id).status == "running"
def test_eligible_user_claims_oldest_by_queue_pos(db):
u = User(email="solo@example.com")
db.add(u)
db.flush()
_quota(db, u.id, max_concurrent=2)
first = _job(db, u.id, queue_pos=1)
_job(db, u.id, queue_pos=2)
db.commit()
assert _claim_job() == first.id
def test_all_candidates_capped_returns_none(db):
u = User(email="capped@example.com")
db.add(u)
db.flush()
_quota(db, u.id, max_concurrent=1)
_job(db, u.id, queue_pos=0, status="running") # at the cap
_job(db, u.id, queue_pos=1) # queued but ineligible
db.commit()
assert _claim_job() is None
def test_stored_zero_concurrency_is_floored_not_starving(db):
# A stray max_concurrent=0 is only reachable by a direct DB edit (admin_set_quota floors at 1),
# but it must not wedge the claim loop. The effective limit floors to 1 on BOTH the read path
# (resolve -> at_concurrency_limit) and in the claim SQL (GREATEST(..., 1)), so the two "at
# limit" checks agree: the user's own first job is claimable and its flood never monopolizes
# the window with permanently-ineligible jobs. (Before the floor, _claim_job returned None here
# — the guard rejected all 60 of A's jobs — and any user behind them starved.)
a = User(email="zero@example.com")
b = User(email="behind@example.com")
db.add_all([a, b])
db.flush()
_quota(db, a.id, max_concurrent=0) # nonsensical stored value
_quota(db, b.id, max_concurrent=2)
for i in range(60):
_job(db, a.id, queue_pos=i)
_job(db, b.id, queue_pos=100)
db.commit()
claimed = _claim_job()
assert claimed is not None # the loop is not wedged
db.expire_all()
assert db.get(DownloadJob, claimed).user_id == a.id # A's own first job runs (floored to 1)
def test_job_whose_asset_is_already_downloading_is_skipped(db):
"""B-sub-3: a queued job whose shared asset is ALREADY `downloading` (another worker owns it) must
not be claimed — otherwise a second worker claims it, finds the asset busy, requeues, and ping-
pongs on it, starving everyone behind. The claim SQL excludes it, so the job behind it (on a
different, free asset) is served instead."""
u = User(email="asset-excl@example.com")
db.add(u)
db.flush()
_quota(
db, u.id, max_concurrent=5
) # high → the ASSET rule, not the per-user rule, does the excluding
busy = _asset(db, status="downloading", ref="busy")
free = _asset(db, status="pending", ref="free")
_job(
db, u.id, queue_pos=1, status="running", asset_id=busy.id
) # the holder actually downloading it
competitor = _job(db, u.id, queue_pos=2, asset_id=busy.id) # same asset — must be skipped
behind = _job(db, u.id, queue_pos=3, asset_id=free.id) # different asset — should be served
db.commit()
assert _claim_job() == behind.id # the competitor on the busy asset was skipped
db.expire_all()
assert db.get(DownloadJob, competitor.id).status == "queued" # still queued, never claimed
def test_unlimited_user_is_never_excluded(db):
u = User(email="unlimited@example.com")
db.add(u)
db.flush()
_quota(db, u.id, max_concurrent=1, unlimited=True)
for i in range(3): # 3 running, well past max_concurrent — but unlimited bypasses the cap
_job(db, u.id, queue_pos=i, status="running")
q = _job(db, u.id, queue_pos=10)
db.commit()
assert _claim_job() == q.id
# --- #3 · list cap --------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_list_downloads_is_capped(db, monkeypatch):
from app.routes import downloads as dl
u = User(email="heavy@example.com")
db.add(u)
db.flush()
for i in range(3):
_job(db, u.id, queue_pos=i, status="done")
db.commit()
monkeypatch.setattr(dl, "_MAX_LIST", 2)
rows = dl.list_downloads(user=u, db=db)
assert len(rows) == 2 # bounded by the cap, not the 3 rows on disk