2fa5c8c39470acc3d06d087f0c66dc8822aa0790
5
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
c7a377396b |
fix(ui): a closing dialog leaves the focus to the dialog standing above it
Round 6 widened dialog focus ownership to count focus inside ANY `aria-modal` subtree as ours, so a dialog and the dialog stacked on it closing together would still hand the focus back. That clause has no way to tell a layer closing WITH us from one that stays open, so a dialog closing on its own — an in-flight mutation's `onSuccess`, not a click, since a scrim covers it — under a modal raised above it pulled the focus onto its own pre-open trigger, behind that scrim, where Enter still activated it. Three verifiers confirmed the mechanism and two corrected the severity down: it self-heals on the next Tab, which is why this is a containment violation rather than a broken end state. `lib/layerStack` cannot refine it. Measured against the real hook: at the instant the lower dialog's focus cleanup runs, the both-closing case and the sibling-stays-open case give identical readings — `anyLayerAbove` true, the upper layer topmost — because passive cleanups run parent-first and `useDialogChrome` is declared before the effect that calls `removeLayer`. Gating on the stack turns round 6's own test red. What separates them is the DOM: React detaches a deleted subtree before passive cleanups, so a layer closing with us is already disconnected while one that stays open is not. Both tests are green, and each was mutation-checked against the other. Verified in Chrome on localdev: opening the cheat sheet from a sidebar button and closing it restores that button; with the command palette stacked over the cheat sheet, closing the top one leaves the focus neither on the background trigger nor on <body>, and closing both returns it to the trigger. Welcome's Lightbox got the trap and the restore in round 6 but not the layer membership the other shells have, so its Escape and Tab fired from a raw window listener whatever was on top — the shape the wizard's comment records being bitten by, unreachable today only by a mount ordering nothing enforces. It joins the stack. Its comment also read as though the four-shell sweep were finished: `PlayerModal` is still an `aria-modal` surface with no name, no trap and no restore, which is on ROADMAP.md now rather than implied to be done. |
||
|
|
f8a31d48cf |
fix(ui): a dialog keeps the focus it was given, and hands it back where it took it from
Round 5 extracted `ui/dialogFocus` so no shell would hand-roll the focus contract, then introduced four ways to lose the focus anyway — all four measured in jsdom against the real components. **Ownership was narrower than the trap.** `ui/Modal` traps Tab over the whole dialog on purpose, so a toast's Undo or ✕ stays reachable; ownership was tracked over the panel alone. Tabbing to that ✕ therefore read as "the user left the dialog", and since removing a toast fires no `focusin` to re-arm, closing afterwards skipped the restore and left the focus on <body>. Before this hook existed the restore was unconditional, so it was a regression. **A dialog stacked above us is still ours.** A nested `ui/Modal` portals into its own host, so it is outside the outer dialog's root however wide that scope is drawn — widening alone could not fix it. Both closing in one commit left the focus on <body>: the outer skipped its restore, and the child's own target (a control inside the outer panel) was already detached, because passive cleanups run parent-first. Ownership now means "inside my dialog, or inside a modal layer above it", which is what the rule always intended. **The wizard disagreed with `ui/Modal` on its first line.** `trapTab(e, panel)`, with neither the dialog-root scope (so its own toast host was outside the cycle — the connection notice never auto-dismisses, and its ✕ was unreachable from the keyboard) nor the `container` argument the JSDoc exists for: `panel.contains( panel)` is true, so focus sitting ON the tabIndex=-1 panel matched no branch and a Shift+Tab walked into the app behind the scrim. Both call sites now pass the same three arguments. **The toast handover was a render-phase read-modify-write.** A `useMemo` read a module global that the next line overwrote; React re-invokes a component body and every `useMemo` factory in it on a StrictMode double render, and the LAST invocation commits — so the second pass re-read what the first had just written, the takeover host classified its OWN new toast as inherited, and the dev build behaved exactly like the code round 5 replaced. Snapshotted through a ref keyed on `isTop`, so a repeated invocation of one render is a no-op. And the fourth `aria-modal` shell, `Welcome`'s screenshot lightbox, is finally swept into the same contract: it declared itself a modal dialog while leaving the focus on the thumbnail behind an 80%-black scrim and letting Tab walk the landing page underneath. The headline fix of the previous commit — StrictMode's re-mount taking the focus off an `autoFocus` field — had no test at all; deleting it left all 1009 green. It has one now. 9 tests, mutation-checked against 8 mutations, each red on the test that names it. |
||
|
|
bc9e34d0ae |
fix(auth): close the three leftovers E9.5 logged but kept out of its diff
DX-17, three one-liners the epic's canonical sweep did not reach:
`routes/setup.py::setup_admin` still resolved the wizard's admin by
literal `User.email ==`. The wizard can be re-run, and E9.5's premise is
that two spellings of one Gmail mailbox are one person — so a second run
under the other spelling would have created exactly the duplicate admin
row the epic exists to prevent.
`routes/admin.py::_decide` hand-rolled `db.get` + 404 where the file's
newer endpoints use `get_or_404`. There were TWO such sites, not the one
the review named; both are converted, per the house rule that a
principle gets fixed everywhere in one sweep.
`useVerifyEntry`'s `hashchange` listener recognised `#verify=` but not
`#reset=`, so pasting a reset link into a tab already running the app
was silently ignored — the same silence that made the verify half a bug.
It now notices, and says out loud that reset links need a signed-out
window; the fragment is still deliberately left in the address bar
(review round 4), so signing out from that tab recovers it.
DX-16: `.catch(() => setOutcome("invalid"))` could not tell a spent
token from a 502 mid-deploy or a dropped connection, and by then the
fragment is cleared — so a network blip was reported as "that link is no
longer valid", pushing the user to request a fresh one on the strength
of a false statement. Only a 400 carrying {code:"verify"} is the
server's verdict now; everything else gets its own outcome, with no
resend CTA, because the token is untouched and retrying it works. The
rule was already written one file away for the reset-link probe: "a
network blip must never be cached as 'this link is dead'".
Two existing tests asserted the old conflation by rejecting with a bare
Error("400"); they now reject with the real HttpError. The errors are
built inside the rejection, not hoisted: mountAt calls vi.resetModules(),
so an HttpError imported earlier is a different class identity and
`instanceof` would quietly miss.
Gate: vitest 671 -> 676, pytest 924 -> 925.
|
||
|
|
c134b514c1 |
fix(auth): confirm an emailed verification link wherever it is opened (E9.5 S2)
The token was only ever consumed inside Welcome.tsx, which App renders ONLY when there is no session. Opening the emailed link in a browser that already held a Siftlode session posted nothing, the fragment was then stripped, and the user got no signal at all -- the link simply did nothing. Incognito worked, which is why it survived. Confirmation now happens in App, above that branch: signed out the outcome still drives the auth card's banners, signed in it drives a top-of-app bar. The entry URL is snapshotted once at import time (lib/entryUrl) instead of per component, so no future URL writer can strip a token before whoever needs it has read it -- that ordering race is what broke this in the first place. POST /auth/verify now names the address it confirmed, which matters when the browser holds a session for a different account; the same reasoning as password_reset_required already covers the disclosure. Also here, from the 2026-09-02 review tail: the dead GET /auth/verify goes (both senders emit the fragment form, and the last query-token link expired 24h after the 0.78.7 deploy), a spent #verify=/#reset= fragment is cleared while signed in, and the auth-card banners get role=status. The verifyOkReset copy no longer blames admin approval, which E9.5 S1 made false. |
||
|
|
85043013f0 |
fix: address the feature review — accurate copy, reachable controls, real coverage
Round 1 on the feature diff found 15; the substantive ones: - The delete control VANISHED on any invite whose address had registered, which is the ordinary sign-up shape (register writes the User and the pending invite together). The guard stays broad — that row is the account's approval gate, and orphaning it strands someone who can then neither sign in nor be approved — but the control is now a disabled button carrying the reason, on both lists, so an admin never sees a row silently missing a button its neighbours have. - Deleting an entry is not always a revoke: is_allowed falls back to the env ALLOWED_EMAILS / ADMIN_EMAILS lists once no row exists, and an ADMIN_EMAILS address is force-promoted on its next Google sign-in. The route now reports still_allowed_by_env and the UI says so instead of claiming access was removed. - "Deny keeps the row so they can't immediately re-ask" was simply false — upsert_pending_invite reopens a denied row. Corrected everywhere it was stated. - The Configuration warning reads me.email_configured, which save() did not invalidate, so it kept warning about fields the admin had just filled in. - The read-only variant was an aria-hidden span explained only by a Tooltip that the hints toggle can switch off; now a disabled button with title + aria-label. - The delete error path threw away the 409's reason (the stale-list case) and left the stale row on screen. - The throttle window was spent even when no notice was written, silencing the next hour on the path whose job is to stop silent drops. - email_enabled() opened a second session and decrypted the SMTP password on every /api/me poll; it now takes the caller's session. - welcomeMode.dom.test.ts never rendered the card, so reverting the history wiring to useState left it green. A render test now drives the real links and fails on that revert (verified). Plus /api/me flag tests, the registration-shaped pending case, the env-allowlist case, and a release note that matches what the code does. |