siftlode

1,699 Commits 1 Branch 73 Tags

3 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
peter	5bfcf5d83a	refactor(e10): move the platform components into components/ui/ and enforce the boundary The app HAS a platform layer -- AnchoredPopover (22 importers, with arrows/typeahead/Escape/anchor-flip), QueryState (21), Modal (17), PageShell, DataTable, Tabs, Tooltip and ~26 more -- but it sat flat among ~160 feature components with nothing marking it as one. Several of those files describe themselves as 'the one place' or 'canonical' and were still bypassed by hand-rolled markup, because a layer nobody can see is a layer nobody uses; three separate inventory passes of this codebase misread it the same way. Moves the 33 domain-free modules into components/ui/, rewrites the imports in 89 files, and makes the boundary a lint rule rather than a convention: inside ui/ a one-level-up import (a feature component) and any lib/api slice are errors. The rule was verified to fire on both and to leave generic lib/ helpers alone. README.md states which side of the line a component belongs on and why. No behaviour change: 3x tsc, eslint, knip, prettier and 687 vitest tests all green; no backend file touched.	2026-09-05 16:58:29 +02:00
peter	fe38dfbcca	fix(e12): close the eighteen findings the E12 review round left standing The deep review of the branch raised 47 findings, 18 of which survived adversarial verification. Grouped by what they actually were: The size ceiling inverted at its boundary. `remaining_bytes` clamped to 0 for a user already at their storage cap, and `build_ydl_opts` reads 0 as "no limit" — so the one user over quota was the only one downloading with no ceiling at all. `check_enqueue` could not catch it: it ran while the job was queued and the user was still under the cap. The arithmetic moves into `quota.remaining_bytes` (where every other max_bytes decision lives, and where it can be tested), and the worker now fails the job outright rather than proceeding unbounded — as a non-retryable `quota_exceeded`, since retrying cannot help until space is freed. Silent failures in the new account panel. All three actions went through `quiet: true` endpoints, which suppress the global error dialog on the promise that the caller reports inline — with no `onError`, that promise was broken and a refusal rendered as nothing. On the broken-SMTP instance this panel exists for, an admin would read silence as "the mail went out". The co-invalidation set and the email-off predicate move to `lib/adminUsers`, shared with the pending-access queue, so the two copies of these mutations cannot drift apart again — which is how half of this was lost in the first place. A rollback recipe that destroyed data without working. `alembic downgrade -1` steps back one migration, but a release routinely ships several (0.80.0 shipped four): it drops the newest one's columns and leaves the schema at a revision the older image also cannot resolve, i.e. the crash loop it was meant to escape, minus the data. The dump restore is now the recommended path, and the alembic route asks the target version for its own head revision instead of counting backwards. Also: redirects named in the urlguard docstring beside the DNS-rebinding residual they share a fix with (SEC-17); a malformed port refused as `bad_port` instead of escaping as a 500; the pull cooldown extended to the sibling route spending the same QuotaAction; restore stops the app before dropping its tables; the PowerShell cleanup can no longer decide the script's verdict on 5.1, nor report the wrong exit code; the documented one-liners hardened to match the scripts; the registry's retention window stated where pinning is advertised; the two banners made mutually exclusive so neither can shadow the other; `hover:bg-hover` (a utility this project never generated) replaced by the `selectable` recipe; the clipboard helper reused; and the sync cooldown's copy swept to the two callers that discarded it. Verified: gate green (vitest 678, pytest 949), and the panel, the row hover and the reset banner UAT'd on localdev.	2026-09-05 03:41:58 +02:00
peter	f98b060e2b	feat(admin): an account panel, and a set-password link that needs no email Design option C, chosen by the user 2026-09-05. Nothing in the admin UI ever showed an account's GATE STATE: an admin could see a "Pending approval" chip but not whether the address was confirmed, whether SEC-10 had cleared the password, or which Google account was attached — so every support conversation started by guessing. Clicking a row now opens a drawer that says which gate the person is actually stuck behind, with the recovery actions under that readout rather than in the row. The drawer is `Modal placement="drawer"`, not a second dialog: the layer stack, ESC, the focus trap, Back-to-close and the scroll lock are the hard parts, and duplicating them is how two shells drift apart. It slides in, and honours prefers-reduced-motion like the rest. The link itself (SEC-15, SEC-16, and the everyday "no SMTP and someone forgot theirs") reuses the existing token machinery and the SAME `#reset=` entry the mailed link uses, so the signed-out card consumes it with no new flow. It is a distinct token KIND for one reason: a mailed reset arrives in the mailbox, so completing it proves ownership and confirms the address; an admin-issued link proves nothing about the mailbox — the admin hands it over by whatever means they choose — so it must not satisfy the email gate. Claiming otherwise would be the same false attestation SEC-15 is about. Issuing does not revoke the current password: a misclick must not lock anyone out. USING it rewrites the hash and bumps the session epoch, which is what evicts a squatter — SEC-16's actual remedy. Spending either kind burns the siblings of both, so a completed reset cannot leave a live admin link behind. The non-consuming probe learned the new kind too, or every admin link would have opened onto "this link is spent". The audit log records that a link was issued, by whom, for whom — never the link, which is a live credential-setting secret and the last thing that belongs in a long-lived log a human reads. Not gated on account state on purpose: it is useful for a pre-empted address, a revoked password, a Google-only account that wants one, and a plain forgotten password. Narrowing it would only make it refuse exactly when the admin needs it. The shared demo account is the one exception. Verified on localdev, both languages, end to end: issue from the panel -> the signed-in tab shows the honest "reset links open in a signed-out window" banner with the token still in the address bar -> signing out draws the "Set a new password" form, which is only possible because the probe recognises the new kind. Gate: pytest 925 -> 942, vitest 676.	2026-09-05 01:46:58 +02:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

peter

5bfcf5d83a

refactor(e10): move the platform components into components/ui/ and enforce the boundary

The app HAS a platform layer -- AnchoredPopover (22 importers, with
arrows/typeahead/Escape/anchor-flip), QueryState (21), Modal (17),
PageShell, DataTable, Tabs, Tooltip and ~26 more -- but it sat flat among
~160 feature components with nothing marking it as one. Several of those
files describe themselves as 'the one place' or 'canonical' and were
still bypassed by hand-rolled markup, because a layer nobody can see is a
layer nobody uses; three separate inventory passes of this codebase
misread it the same way.

Moves the 33 domain-free modules into components/ui/, rewrites the
imports in 89 files, and makes the boundary a lint rule rather than a
convention: inside ui/ a one-level-up import (a feature component) and
any lib/api slice are errors. The rule was verified to fire on both and
to leave generic lib/ helpers alone. README.md states which side of the
line a component belongs on and why.

No behaviour change: 3x tsc, eslint, knip, prettier and 687 vitest tests
all green; no backend file touched.

2026-09-05 16:58:29 +02:00

peter

fe38dfbcca

fix(e12): close the eighteen findings the E12 review round left standing

The deep review of the branch raised 47 findings, 18 of which survived adversarial
verification. Grouped by what they actually were:

**The size ceiling inverted at its boundary.** `remaining_bytes` clamped to 0 for a user
already at their storage cap, and `build_ydl_opts` reads 0 as "no limit" — so the one
user over quota was the only one downloading with no ceiling at all. `check_enqueue`
could not catch it: it ran while the job was queued and the user was still under the cap.
The arithmetic moves into `quota.remaining_bytes` (where every other max_bytes decision
lives, and where it can be tested), and the worker now fails the job outright rather than
proceeding unbounded — as a non-retryable `quota_exceeded`, since retrying cannot help
until space is freed.

**Silent failures in the new account panel.** All three actions went through `quiet: true`
endpoints, which suppress the global error dialog on the promise that the caller reports
inline — with no `onError`, that promise was broken and a refusal rendered as nothing. On
the broken-SMTP instance this panel exists for, an admin would read silence as "the mail
went out". The co-invalidation set and the email-off predicate move to `lib/adminUsers`,
shared with the pending-access queue, so the two copies of these mutations cannot drift
apart again — which is how half of this was lost in the first place.

**A rollback recipe that destroyed data without working.** `alembic downgrade -1` steps
back one migration, but a release routinely ships several (0.80.0 shipped four): it drops
the newest one's columns and leaves the schema at a revision the older image also cannot
resolve, i.e. the crash loop it was meant to escape, minus the data. The dump restore is
now the recommended path, and the alembic route asks the target version for its own head
revision instead of counting backwards.

Also: redirects named in the urlguard docstring beside the DNS-rebinding residual they
share a fix with (SEC-17); a malformed port refused as `bad_port` instead of escaping as
a 500; the pull cooldown extended to the sibling route spending the same QuotaAction;
restore stops the app before dropping its tables; the PowerShell cleanup can no longer
decide the script's verdict on 5.1, nor report the wrong exit code; the documented
one-liners hardened to match the scripts; the registry's retention window stated where
pinning is advertised; the two banners made mutually exclusive so neither can shadow the
other; `hover:bg-hover` (a utility this project never generated) replaced by the
`selectable` recipe; the clipboard helper reused; and the sync cooldown's copy swept to
the two callers that discarded it.

Verified: gate green (vitest 678, pytest 949), and the panel, the row hover and the reset
banner UAT'd on localdev.

2026-09-05 03:41:58 +02:00

peter

f98b060e2b

feat(admin): an account panel, and a set-password link that needs no email

Design option C, chosen by the user 2026-09-05. Nothing in the admin UI
ever showed an account's GATE STATE: an admin could see a "Pending
approval" chip but not whether the address was confirmed, whether SEC-10
had cleared the password, or which Google account was attached — so
every support conversation started by guessing. Clicking a row now opens
a drawer that says which gate the person is actually stuck behind, with
the recovery actions under that readout rather than in the row.

The drawer is `Modal placement="drawer"`, not a second dialog: the layer
stack, ESC, the focus trap, Back-to-close and the scroll lock are the
hard parts, and duplicating them is how two shells drift apart. It
slides in, and honours prefers-reduced-motion like the rest.

The link itself (SEC-15, SEC-16, and the everyday "no SMTP and someone
forgot theirs") reuses the existing token machinery and the SAME
`#reset=` entry the mailed link uses, so the signed-out card consumes it
with no new flow. It is a distinct token KIND for one reason: a mailed
reset arrives in the mailbox, so completing it proves ownership and
confirms the address; an admin-issued link proves nothing about the
mailbox — the admin hands it over by whatever means they choose — so it
must not satisfy the email gate. Claiming otherwise would be the same
false attestation SEC-15 is about.

Issuing does not revoke the current password: a misclick must not lock
anyone out. USING it rewrites the hash and bumps the session epoch,
which is what evicts a squatter — SEC-16's actual remedy. Spending
either kind burns the siblings of both, so a completed reset cannot
leave a live admin link behind. The non-consuming probe learned the new
kind too, or every admin link would have opened onto "this link is
spent". The audit log records that a link was issued, by whom, for whom
— never the link, which is a live credential-setting secret and the last
thing that belongs in a long-lived log a human reads.

Not gated on account state on purpose: it is useful for a pre-empted
address, a revoked password, a Google-only account that wants one, and a
plain forgotten password. Narrowing it would only make it refuse exactly
when the admin needs it. The shared demo account is the one exception.

Verified on localdev, both languages, end to end: issue from the panel
-> the signed-in tab shows the honest "reset links open in a signed-out
window" banner with the token still in the address bar -> signing out
draws the "Set a new password" form, which is only possible because the
probe recognises the new kind. Gate: pytest 925 -> 942, vitest 676.

2026-09-05 01:46:58 +02:00