6d49da17fe8ef74448f95cd903a1a4f3bc75b4aa
6
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 peter
|
6d49da17fe |
fix(api): a write that hit a connection failure is still reported, and every failure is reported once
Deep-review round 4, the "one report per failure" contract round 3 introduced. - `req` marked gateway (502/503/504) and network failures "already reported" because they raise the connection notice. But that notice is about connectivity and removes itself on the very next answer — which every caller's own resync refetch fetches at once — so a delete that hit a keepalive reset flashed the notice and was then reported nowhere, the list still there. Only the durable reports (the error dialog, the 401 sign-out) count now; the caller says the action failed. - A connection notice the user closed swallowed every later one for the rest of the visit; it is raised again. - `req` and `uploadReq` share one failure policy (`reportFailure`). The upload copy had drifted: a 502 opened the blocking "Server error (502)" dialog and cleared a notice that was still true. - A taken Plex collection name is a structured 409, localized, and the create/rename calls are quiet: it was an English dialog plus a Hungarian toast. `notifyCollectionEditError` is gone. - The mutation onErrors that toasted unconditionally after a non-quiet request (invite approve / deny / add, demo whitelist, audit clear, scheduler, share, full history, edit, config tests, tag attach) go through `notifyActionError`; the playlist delete's hand-rolled copy of it too (it takes a level now). The user role / suspend / delete actions had no onError at all: a user deleted in another tab failed silently and stayed listed — now said, and the list refetched. |
||
|
peter
|
fe38dfbcca |
fix(e12): close the eighteen findings the E12 review round left standing
The deep review of the branch raised 47 findings, 18 of which survived adversarial verification. Grouped by what they actually were: **The size ceiling inverted at its boundary.** `remaining_bytes` clamped to 0 for a user already at their storage cap, and `build_ydl_opts` reads 0 as "no limit" — so the one user over quota was the only one downloading with no ceiling at all. `check_enqueue` could not catch it: it ran while the job was queued and the user was still under the cap. The arithmetic moves into `quota.remaining_bytes` (where every other max_bytes decision lives, and where it can be tested), and the worker now fails the job outright rather than proceeding unbounded — as a non-retryable `quota_exceeded`, since retrying cannot help until space is freed. **Silent failures in the new account panel.** All three actions went through `quiet: true` endpoints, which suppress the global error dialog on the promise that the caller reports inline — with no `onError`, that promise was broken and a refusal rendered as nothing. On the broken-SMTP instance this panel exists for, an admin would read silence as "the mail went out". The co-invalidation set and the email-off predicate move to `lib/adminUsers`, shared with the pending-access queue, so the two copies of these mutations cannot drift apart again — which is how half of this was lost in the first place. **A rollback recipe that destroyed data without working.** `alembic downgrade -1` steps back one migration, but a release routinely ships several (0.80.0 shipped four): it drops the newest one's columns and leaves the schema at a revision the older image also cannot resolve, i.e. the crash loop it was meant to escape, minus the data. The dump restore is now the recommended path, and the alembic route asks the target version for its own head revision instead of counting backwards. Also: redirects named in the urlguard docstring beside the DNS-rebinding residual they share a fix with (SEC-17); a malformed port refused as `bad_port` instead of escaping as a 500; the pull cooldown extended to the sibling route spending the same QuotaAction; restore stops the app before dropping its tables; the PowerShell cleanup can no longer decide the script's verdict on 5.1, nor report the wrong exit code; the documented one-liners hardened to match the scripts; the registry's retention window stated where pinning is advertised; the two banners made mutually exclusive so neither can shadow the other; `hover:bg-hover` (a utility this project never generated) replaced by the `selectable` recipe; the clipboard helper reused; and the sync cooldown's copy swept to the two callers that discarded it. Verified: gate green (vitest 678, pytest 949), and the panel, the row hover and the reset banner UAT'd on localdev. |
||
|
peter
|
f98b060e2b |
feat(admin): an account panel, and a set-password link that needs no email
Design option C, chosen by the user 2026-09-05. Nothing in the admin UI ever showed an account's GATE STATE: an admin could see a "Pending approval" chip but not whether the address was confirmed, whether SEC-10 had cleared the password, or which Google account was attached — so every support conversation started by guessing. Clicking a row now opens a drawer that says which gate the person is actually stuck behind, with the recovery actions under that readout rather than in the row. The drawer is `Modal placement="drawer"`, not a second dialog: the layer stack, ESC, the focus trap, Back-to-close and the scroll lock are the hard parts, and duplicating them is how two shells drift apart. It slides in, and honours prefers-reduced-motion like the rest. The link itself (SEC-15, SEC-16, and the everyday "no SMTP and someone forgot theirs") reuses the existing token machinery and the SAME `#reset=` entry the mailed link uses, so the signed-out card consumes it with no new flow. It is a distinct token KIND for one reason: a mailed reset arrives in the mailbox, so completing it proves ownership and confirms the address; an admin-issued link proves nothing about the mailbox — the admin hands it over by whatever means they choose — so it must not satisfy the email gate. Claiming otherwise would be the same false attestation SEC-15 is about. Issuing does not revoke the current password: a misclick must not lock anyone out. USING it rewrites the hash and bumps the session epoch, which is what evicts a squatter — SEC-16's actual remedy. Spending either kind burns the siblings of both, so a completed reset cannot leave a live admin link behind. The non-consuming probe learned the new kind too, or every admin link would have opened onto "this link is spent". The audit log records that a link was issued, by whom, for whom — never the link, which is a live credential-setting secret and the last thing that belongs in a long-lived log a human reads. Not gated on account state on purpose: it is useful for a pre-empted address, a revoked password, a Google-only account that wants one, and a plain forgotten password. Narrowing it would only make it refuse exactly when the admin needs it. The shared demo account is the one exception. Verified on localdev, both languages, end to end: issue from the panel -> the signed-in tab shows the honest "reset links open in a signed-out window" banner with the token still in the address bar -> signing out draws the "Set a new password" form, which is only possible because the probe recognises the new kind. Gate: pytest 925 -> 942, vitest 676. |
||
|
peter
|
7acdf5d577 |
feat(admin): surface the sign-ups that are stuck outside, and let an admin finish letting them in (E9.5 S5)
Approve an address BEFORE the person registers and their sign-up produces no queue row at all — `_decide` only takes a still-pending invite — so the Access-requests screen sat empty, the tab badge read zero, and the only working move was re-typing the address into the whitelist box. Nobody would guess that, and on 2026-09-03 nobody did. This is roadmap UX-25, where two earlier attempts were reverted after review. Both moved AUTHORITY: auto-activating on registration turns a standing whitelist entry into a bearer grant for whoever registers the address first, and reopening the approved invite to `pending` lets an anonymous sign-up REVOKE a standing approval. What was actually missing was visibility, so this changes nothing about what an unauthenticated caller can cause — the admin could already do exactly this by re-entering the address; they just had no way to know they had to. The section lists every account that cannot sign in yet and says WHICH gate is shut, because the two dead ends look the same from the admin's chair: waiting for activation, or waiting on a confirmation mail. Naming the unconfirmed ones is not decoration — on a no-SMTP instance that is the difference between the owner and whoever registered the address first (SEC-15), and an admin about to let someone in should see it. A person the queue above already covers is deliberately NOT listed here; two buttons for one person is worse than one. Activate is gated on `is_allowed` — the same function the sign-in paths consult, in core, so the button that appears and the badge that counts cannot disagree. Without that gate it would manufacture an inconsistent account: password sign-in only checks `is_active` and would let them in, while their Google sign-in would be turned away and silently reopened as a fresh access request. Letting in someone with no approved invite stays the whitelist box's job, which says so out loud. The badge counts activations SEPARATELY from pending invites rather than widening an existing field's meaning, and only counts what genuinely waits on the admin: an unconfirmed account waits on its owner, so it is listed with a re-send but does not nag. The admin-side resend says plainly what happened, including refusing when the instance has no working SMTP — mail is fail-soft everywhere else, and that silence is exactly what left the 0.78.5 sign-ups with nothing to fall back on. `send_verification_link` is now one function with three callers (registration, the public resend, this one), so the link's shape and TTL cannot drift by who triggered it. UAT on localdev, both languages: the UX-25 shape reproduced end to end (approve the address, then register), the badge counting it, Activate letting them in and dropping the badge, the row losing its Activate but keeping the re-send, a fresh token issued by the re-send, and both actions in the audit log. Test data removed. |
||
|
peter
|
b6f6a4d72a |
feat(admin): user management — roles, suspend, delete + lifecycle emails
- New Users page tabs (Users & roles / Access requests / Demo) and a tab-ified Configuration page, both via a reusable Tabs component (persisted active tab). - Admin can suspend/unsuspend (migration 0023 adds users.is_suspended) and delete accounts from the Users & roles tab, with guards (demo / self / last admin). - Email notifications to the affected user: suspended (reactive, on a blocked sign-in), reinstated, role changed, and account deleted; the approval email now carries a clickable app link. The scheduled/manual demo reset also seeds sample channel subscriptions. - Hide the 'unverified email' chip for Google accounts (Google attests the email). |
||
|
peter
|
737da6bd96 |
feat(auth): admin Users page + allow_registration toggle (5a frontend)
New admin-only Users page (sidebar): Users & roles (list + promote/demote with confirm; self/demo/last-admin guarded server-side), plus the Access requests (Invite whitelist) and Demo whitelist+reset migrated out of Settings → Account (same data/tables — UI relocated only). Settings → Account now holds personal content only. ConfigPanel learns a boolean field type (toggle) for the new allow_registration setting. api methods, new 'users' page/route/nav/header, and EN/HU/DE strings (new users namespace + access group). |