7ae5c57b6b8d7d124b6f9660b8fbd2274bb01f27
8
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 peter
|
14f1c97c0a |
fix(e12): a bare up -d picks the wrong compose file, and recreates the database
Round four, on round three's diff. 47 -> 34 -> 15 -> 7 raw findings. **The printed restart command could strand the restored data.** Round three replaced `start` with `up -d` because `start` ignores a newly pinned tag — but printed it bare. In the git-clone layout BOTH compose files exist, so the scripts' COMPOSE_FILE fallback never fires and a bare `docker compose up -d` reads `docker-compose.yml`: different volume names, locally built images, no IMAGE_TAG at all. `stop` and `exec` had been fine there (they resolve running containers by project and service), but `up -d` RECREATES — so the operator pastes the hint straight after a successful restore and gets `db` on a new empty volume and a first-run setup wizard, with their data in an orphaned volume. Verified: the two files resolve `siftlode_pgdata` vs `pgdata` and different images. The scripts no longer print a command that recreates from a file they did not resolve. They name the compose file when they resolved one, and otherwise say to start it the way the operator normally does — with the caveats on their own lines rather than in a parenthetical at the end of a very long one. **The reset flag is now decided where the live hash is already parsed.** Round three cleared it in the token effect, which only runs when a NEW verify token arrives — so the back button, or re-pasting an already-consumed verify link, still left the banner promising a recovery whose token was gone. Setting it from the hash on every fragment change is both smaller and closes those. Also: the doc said `start` "still carries the old tag" four lines after "pin the older IMAGE_TAG", where "old" then reads as the tag being rolled back TO — it now reuses the scripts' unambiguous wording; the Windows recipe removes a partially-copied dump before throwing, so a mid-stream `cp` failure cannot leave a truncated file under the final name; and `$WarningPreference` is pinned beside `$ErrorActionPreference` so an inherited SilentlyContinue cannot drop the half-restored warning, with the comment corrected to say what the warning stream actually is. Gate green: vitest 685, pytest 950. |
||
|
peter
|
fc56f514b3 |
fix(e12): the restart hint pointed at the one command that undoes a rollback
Round three, on round two's diff. The trend across the loop is 47 -> 34 -> 15 raw findings; the ops half kept producing the sharpest ones because the gate cannot run it. **`docker compose start` ignores a newly pinned IMAGE_TAG.** Round two removed the automatic restart because it re-ran `alembic upgrade head` — and then told the operator to run that exact command by hand, in both scripts and the docs. `start` relaunches the container that already exists, which still carries the tag being rolled back FROM, so pinning 0.79.0 and following the printed instruction brings 0.80.0 back up and re-applies its migrations. Verified against a real daemon: after changing the pinned tag, `start` kept the old image and only `up -d` picked up the new one. Both scripts and the doc now say `up -d`, with the pin-first caveat where the operator reads it. **The reset flag outlived its token.** Reverting round one's "each link clears the other" went one step too far: a `#verify=` link pasted over a standing reset notice replaces the whole fragment, so the reset token is gone — but `resetPending` stayed true, and being checked first it hid the confirmation while promising a recovery that signing out could no longer complete. The flag is now cleared when the fragment it describes is gone, which is narrower than what was reverted and does not blank the signed-out card. **A test that could not fail.** The shared-asset regression test seeded the asset as `pending`, and `_reset_asset_pending` only acts on `downloading` — so the release half was a no-op and deleting it kept the suite green. Seeded as the worker actually leaves it now. Also: the malformed-URL guard answers with urlguard's structured detail rather than a bare English string, so both halves of one typo class get the same localized copy, and the third site in that module handing user input to `urlparse` was swept with it; the asset is released after the job is terminal, not before; the Stats 403 toast gets the wizard handle its own comment claimed it had; the pasted Windows recipe sets `$ErrorActionPreference` inside the block (a scriptblock inherits the caller's, so a `SilentlyContinue` profile swallowed every throw) and cleans up the container-side dump on the failure path too; the restore warning moved to the warning stream so a `> log` redirect cannot file it away; and two comments narrowed to what the code does. Gate green: vitest 685, pytest 950. |
||
|
peter
|
358d722ce9 |
fix(e12): close what round one broke, and revert two fixes that overreached
Round two of the review loop, on round one's own diff. Two of its findings were regressions the fixes themselves introduced, which is exactly what the loop is for: **A per-user refusal was writing onto a shared row.** MediaAssets are deduped across users, and the generic failure handler puts the message on the asset — right for an upstream failure, wrong for "your storage is full". Two users queuing the same video share one asset, so the first user hitting their cap failed the second user's job with the first one's private reason, telling someone with an empty library to free up space. The refusal now raises `_OwnerRefused`, caught separately: the job fails, the asset goes back to `pending` for whoever else holds it. Pinned by a test that drives `_download` directly — the refusal happens before extraction, so nothing needs stubbing. **The restore scripts restarted the app, undoing the restore.** `docker compose start` re-runs the container command, and that runs `alembic upgrade head` — so on the rollback path this documents as recommended (restore the dump, THEN pin the older tag) the newer image immediately re-applied the migrations the restore had just undone, and on a FAILED restore it put the app back on a half-restored schema. Both are the opposite of why the stop was added. Nothing is restarted automatically now; the scripts say what to run and when, and the docs' snippets say the same. **Reverted rather than patched:** the OnboardingWizard toast (the wizard already renders that failure inline, next to a Retry button — three recoveries for one failure), and `useVerifyEntry`'s "each new link clears the other". The latter blanked the signed-out card's only banner, where nothing renders the reset flag to replace it. The two states are independent again; what changes is that `dismiss` peels ONE layer, which is what the original finding was actually about. Also: `Stats` uses the YouTube helper rather than the bare one, so the route's English 403 detail no longer beats the translated fallback under a Hungarian UI; `urlparse` guarded alongside `.port` (an unclosed bracket raised just as late), the reason renamed `malformed` since "bad port" misdescribes it; three docstrings narrowed to what the code actually does (the worker's byte check is per-job, not an aggregate ledger, and not on the edit path; the redirect residual leaks a reachability oracle, which the note had denied; the invalidation helper does not cover suspend); the pasted Windows recipe wrapped so `throw` can stop it; the bash one-liner's failure branch no longer exits 0; and the tests that were missing for the round-one fixes — the account panel's error paths, the invalidation set, and the shared-asset case above. Gate green: vitest 685, pytest 950. |
||
|
peter
|
fe38dfbcca |
fix(e12): close the eighteen findings the E12 review round left standing
The deep review of the branch raised 47 findings, 18 of which survived adversarial verification. Grouped by what they actually were: **The size ceiling inverted at its boundary.** `remaining_bytes` clamped to 0 for a user already at their storage cap, and `build_ydl_opts` reads 0 as "no limit" — so the one user over quota was the only one downloading with no ceiling at all. `check_enqueue` could not catch it: it ran while the job was queued and the user was still under the cap. The arithmetic moves into `quota.remaining_bytes` (where every other max_bytes decision lives, and where it can be tested), and the worker now fails the job outright rather than proceeding unbounded — as a non-retryable `quota_exceeded`, since retrying cannot help until space is freed. **Silent failures in the new account panel.** All three actions went through `quiet: true` endpoints, which suppress the global error dialog on the promise that the caller reports inline — with no `onError`, that promise was broken and a refusal rendered as nothing. On the broken-SMTP instance this panel exists for, an admin would read silence as "the mail went out". The co-invalidation set and the email-off predicate move to `lib/adminUsers`, shared with the pending-access queue, so the two copies of these mutations cannot drift apart again — which is how half of this was lost in the first place. **A rollback recipe that destroyed data without working.** `alembic downgrade -1` steps back one migration, but a release routinely ships several (0.80.0 shipped four): it drops the newest one's columns and leaves the schema at a revision the older image also cannot resolve, i.e. the crash loop it was meant to escape, minus the data. The dump restore is now the recommended path, and the alembic route asks the target version for its own head revision instead of counting backwards. Also: redirects named in the urlguard docstring beside the DNS-rebinding residual they share a fix with (SEC-17); a malformed port refused as `bad_port` instead of escaping as a 500; the pull cooldown extended to the sibling route spending the same QuotaAction; restore stops the app before dropping its tables; the PowerShell cleanup can no longer decide the script's verdict on 5.1, nor report the wrong exit code; the documented one-liners hardened to match the scripts; the registry's retention window stated where pinning is advertised; the two banners made mutually exclusive so neither can shadow the other; `hover:bg-hover` (a utility this project never generated) replaced by the `selectable` recipe; the clipboard helper reused; and the sync cooldown's copy swept to the two callers that discarded it. Verified: gate green (vitest 678, pytest 949), and the panel, the row hover and the reset banner UAT'd on localdev. |
||
|
peter
|
bc9e34d0ae |
fix(auth): close the three leftovers E9.5 logged but kept out of its diff
DX-17, three one-liners the epic's canonical sweep did not reach:
`routes/setup.py::setup_admin` still resolved the wizard's admin by
literal `User.email ==`. The wizard can be re-run, and E9.5's premise is
that two spellings of one Gmail mailbox are one person — so a second run
under the other spelling would have created exactly the duplicate admin
row the epic exists to prevent.
`routes/admin.py::_decide` hand-rolled `db.get` + 404 where the file's
newer endpoints use `get_or_404`. There were TWO such sites, not the one
the review named; both are converted, per the house rule that a
principle gets fixed everywhere in one sweep.
`useVerifyEntry`'s `hashchange` listener recognised `#verify=` but not
`#reset=`, so pasting a reset link into a tab already running the app
was silently ignored — the same silence that made the verify half a bug.
It now notices, and says out loud that reset links need a signed-out
window; the fragment is still deliberately left in the address bar
(review round 4), so signing out from that tab recovers it.
DX-16: `.catch(() => setOutcome("invalid"))` could not tell a spent
token from a 502 mid-deploy or a dropped connection, and by then the
fragment is cleared — so a network blip was reported as "that link is no
longer valid", pushing the user to request a fresh one on the strength
of a false statement. Only a 400 carrying {code:"verify"} is the
server's verdict now; everything else gets its own outcome, with no
resend CTA, because the token is untouched and retrying it works. The
rule was already written one file away for the reset-link probe: "a
network blip must never be cached as 'this link is dead'".
Two existing tests asserted the old conflation by rejecting with a bare
Error("400"); they now reject with the real HttpError. The errors are
built inside the rejection, not hoisted: mountAt calls vi.resetModules(),
so an HttpError imported earlier is a different class identity and
`instanceof` would quietly miss.
Gate: vitest 671 -> 676, pytest 924 -> 925.
|
||
|
peter
|
a03bf8d371 |
fix(auth): stop erasing a reset link the signed-in tree never reads (E9.5 review round 4)
Round 4 came back converged — nothing above low, and both findings in one family. This is the half worth fixing, because the branch introduced it. Only the signed-out auth card consumes a `#reset=` token, and S2 moved the address-bar cleanup up to a hook App mounts unconditionally. So opening a password-reset link in a browser that already holds a session erased the token from the URL while nothing had read it: the page loads, nothing is said, and clicking the link again does exactly the same, because the token is untouched and the session is still there. That is the dead end this epic exists to remove, and `main` did not have it — the strip used to live inside the card, which a signed-in visitor never renders. An unspent reset fragment now stays, which restores the recovery that shape always had: signing out reloads with the fragment intact and the form is waiting. Once the card has spent the token a later reload meets S4's named dead-link screen, which is true. The affirmative version — a banner telling a signed-in visitor that reset links open in a signed-out window — is logged with DX-15, along with the `hashchange` half that still only recognises `#verify=`. |
||
|
peter
|
e5997ca567 |
fix(auth): consume a verification token that arrives without a page load (E9.5 S2)
Found in UAT. Navigating a tab that already runs the app to a URL differing only in the fragment is a same-document navigation: nothing reloads, so the import-time entry snapshot never sees the token. It sat unconsumed in the address bar and the previous outcome stayed on screen -- the same silence this sprint set out to remove, wearing a different hat. Pasting the emailed link into a running tab does exactly this, and our verification mails were plain text until 0.78.8, which makes pasting the normal way to use one. A hashchange listener now picks up the new token, the guard tracks consumed tokens rather than a single fired flag (still exactly one POST per token), and a fresh link clears the standing outcome instead of leaving the old banner up. |
||
|
peter
|
c134b514c1 |
fix(auth): confirm an emailed verification link wherever it is opened (E9.5 S2)
The token was only ever consumed inside Welcome.tsx, which App renders ONLY when there is no session. Opening the emailed link in a browser that already held a Siftlode session posted nothing, the fragment was then stripped, and the user got no signal at all -- the link simply did nothing. Incognito worked, which is why it survived. Confirmation now happens in App, above that branch: signed out the outcome still drives the auth card's banners, signed in it drives a top-of-app bar. The entry URL is snapshotted once at import time (lib/entryUrl) instead of per component, so no future URL writer can strip a token before whoever needs it has read it -- that ordering race is what broke this in the first place. POST /auth/verify now names the address it confirmed, which matters when the browser holds a session for a different account; the same reasoning as password_reset_required already covers the disclosure. Also here, from the 2026-09-02 review tail: the dead GET /auth/verify goes (both senders emit the fragment form, and the last query-token link expired 24h after the 0.78.7 deploy), a spent #verify=/#reset= fragment is cleared while signed in, and the auth-card banners get role=status. The verifyOkReset copy no longer blames admin approval, which E9.5 S1 made false. |