cc8cf96c191850c6ed312eb37316d7f2ef8bc0e5
8
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 peter
|
9f28f46839 |
fix(e12): unbreak the gate, and stop printing a command that can strand the restore
Round five. 47 -> 34 -> 15 -> 7 -> 6 raw findings, and this round's sharpest was the loop's own blind spot: **the branch did not pass the gate.** `prettier --check` is one of its eight lanes and I had been running the other seven, so an unformatted `onError` from round one sat on the branch for four rounds — `siftlode publish` would have refused it, with no --skip flag to get past. **The restart hint could still strand the restored data.** Round four said the scripts no longer print a command they cannot resolve; they did. The COMPOSE_FILE fallback only fires when `docker-compose.yml` is ABSENT, so in a source checkout it never fires and the hint expanded to a bare, pasteable `docker compose up -d` — which reads the other file, whose volumes are `pgdata`/`downloads` rather than `siftlode_pgdata`/`siftlode_downloads`, and recreates the database on an empty one. When the file is unresolved the scripts now print `-f <the compose file you started with>`: not runnable, which is the point. **A comment naming the wrong owner.** `formats.py` still said a zero budget is "a refusal for enqueue to make" — the premise round one disproved, three files away from the two docstrings that now say the opposite. Anyone acting on it would delete the worker's refusal and re-open the original inversion, so it now says where the refusal actually lives. Also: the reset-flag rule was rewritten in three consecutive rounds and pinned by nothing — two tests now cover a fragment losing its token, both by a pasted verify link and by navigating away entirely; `backup.ps1` deletes a partially-copied dump before throwing, the guard round four gave the docs but not the script it mirrors; and one comment that read as if the asset were untouched by a line four below it. Gate green, all eight lanes: ruff, ruff format, 3x tsc, eslint, prettier, knip, vitest 687, pytest 950. |
||
|
peter
|
358d722ce9 |
fix(e12): close what round one broke, and revert two fixes that overreached
Round two of the review loop, on round one's own diff. Two of its findings were regressions the fixes themselves introduced, which is exactly what the loop is for: **A per-user refusal was writing onto a shared row.** MediaAssets are deduped across users, and the generic failure handler puts the message on the asset — right for an upstream failure, wrong for "your storage is full". Two users queuing the same video share one asset, so the first user hitting their cap failed the second user's job with the first one's private reason, telling someone with an empty library to free up space. The refusal now raises `_OwnerRefused`, caught separately: the job fails, the asset goes back to `pending` for whoever else holds it. Pinned by a test that drives `_download` directly — the refusal happens before extraction, so nothing needs stubbing. **The restore scripts restarted the app, undoing the restore.** `docker compose start` re-runs the container command, and that runs `alembic upgrade head` — so on the rollback path this documents as recommended (restore the dump, THEN pin the older tag) the newer image immediately re-applied the migrations the restore had just undone, and on a FAILED restore it put the app back on a half-restored schema. Both are the opposite of why the stop was added. Nothing is restarted automatically now; the scripts say what to run and when, and the docs' snippets say the same. **Reverted rather than patched:** the OnboardingWizard toast (the wizard already renders that failure inline, next to a Retry button — three recoveries for one failure), and `useVerifyEntry`'s "each new link clears the other". The latter blanked the signed-out card's only banner, where nothing renders the reset flag to replace it. The two states are independent again; what changes is that `dismiss` peels ONE layer, which is what the original finding was actually about. Also: `Stats` uses the YouTube helper rather than the bare one, so the route's English 403 detail no longer beats the translated fallback under a Hungarian UI; `urlparse` guarded alongside `.port` (an unclosed bracket raised just as late), the reason renamed `malformed` since "bad port" misdescribes it; three docstrings narrowed to what the code actually does (the worker's byte check is per-job, not an aggregate ledger, and not on the edit path; the redirect residual leaks a reachability oracle, which the note had denied; the invalidation helper does not cover suspend); the pasted Windows recipe wrapped so `throw` can stop it; the bash one-liner's failure branch no longer exits 0; and the tests that were missing for the round-one fixes — the account panel's error paths, the invalidation set, and the shared-asset case above. Gate green: vitest 685, pytest 950. |
||
|
peter
|
fe38dfbcca |
fix(e12): close the eighteen findings the E12 review round left standing
The deep review of the branch raised 47 findings, 18 of which survived adversarial verification. Grouped by what they actually were: **The size ceiling inverted at its boundary.** `remaining_bytes` clamped to 0 for a user already at their storage cap, and `build_ydl_opts` reads 0 as "no limit" — so the one user over quota was the only one downloading with no ceiling at all. `check_enqueue` could not catch it: it ran while the job was queued and the user was still under the cap. The arithmetic moves into `quota.remaining_bytes` (where every other max_bytes decision lives, and where it can be tested), and the worker now fails the job outright rather than proceeding unbounded — as a non-retryable `quota_exceeded`, since retrying cannot help until space is freed. **Silent failures in the new account panel.** All three actions went through `quiet: true` endpoints, which suppress the global error dialog on the promise that the caller reports inline — with no `onError`, that promise was broken and a refusal rendered as nothing. On the broken-SMTP instance this panel exists for, an admin would read silence as "the mail went out". The co-invalidation set and the email-off predicate move to `lib/adminUsers`, shared with the pending-access queue, so the two copies of these mutations cannot drift apart again — which is how half of this was lost in the first place. **A rollback recipe that destroyed data without working.** `alembic downgrade -1` steps back one migration, but a release routinely ships several (0.80.0 shipped four): it drops the newest one's columns and leaves the schema at a revision the older image also cannot resolve, i.e. the crash loop it was meant to escape, minus the data. The dump restore is now the recommended path, and the alembic route asks the target version for its own head revision instead of counting backwards. Also: redirects named in the urlguard docstring beside the DNS-rebinding residual they share a fix with (SEC-17); a malformed port refused as `bad_port` instead of escaping as a 500; the pull cooldown extended to the sibling route spending the same QuotaAction; restore stops the app before dropping its tables; the PowerShell cleanup can no longer decide the script's verdict on 5.1, nor report the wrong exit code; the documented one-liners hardened to match the scripts; the registry's retention window stated where pinning is advertised; the two banners made mutually exclusive so neither can shadow the other; `hover:bg-hover` (a utility this project never generated) replaced by the `selectable` recipe; the clipboard helper reused; and the sync cooldown's copy swept to the two callers that discarded it. Verified: gate green (vitest 678, pytest 949), and the panel, the row hover and the reset banner UAT'd on localdev. |
||
|
peter
|
bc9e34d0ae |
fix(auth): close the three leftovers E9.5 logged but kept out of its diff
DX-17, three one-liners the epic's canonical sweep did not reach:
`routes/setup.py::setup_admin` still resolved the wizard's admin by
literal `User.email ==`. The wizard can be re-run, and E9.5's premise is
that two spellings of one Gmail mailbox are one person — so a second run
under the other spelling would have created exactly the duplicate admin
row the epic exists to prevent.
`routes/admin.py::_decide` hand-rolled `db.get` + 404 where the file's
newer endpoints use `get_or_404`. There were TWO such sites, not the one
the review named; both are converted, per the house rule that a
principle gets fixed everywhere in one sweep.
`useVerifyEntry`'s `hashchange` listener recognised `#verify=` but not
`#reset=`, so pasting a reset link into a tab already running the app
was silently ignored — the same silence that made the verify half a bug.
It now notices, and says out loud that reset links need a signed-out
window; the fragment is still deliberately left in the address bar
(review round 4), so signing out from that tab recovers it.
DX-16: `.catch(() => setOutcome("invalid"))` could not tell a spent
token from a 502 mid-deploy or a dropped connection, and by then the
fragment is cleared — so a network blip was reported as "that link is no
longer valid", pushing the user to request a fresh one on the strength
of a false statement. Only a 400 carrying {code:"verify"} is the
server's verdict now; everything else gets its own outcome, with no
resend CTA, because the token is untouched and retrying it works. The
rule was already written one file away for the reset-link probe: "a
network blip must never be cached as 'this link is dead'".
Two existing tests asserted the old conflation by rejecting with a bare
Error("400"); they now reject with the real HttpError. The errors are
built inside the rejection, not hoisted: mountAt calls vi.resetModules(),
so an HttpError imported earlier is a different class identity and
`instanceof` would quietly miss.
Gate: vitest 671 -> 676, pytest 924 -> 925.
|
||
|
peter
|
a03bf8d371 |
fix(auth): stop erasing a reset link the signed-in tree never reads (E9.5 review round 4)
Round 4 came back converged — nothing above low, and both findings in one family. This is the half worth fixing, because the branch introduced it. Only the signed-out auth card consumes a `#reset=` token, and S2 moved the address-bar cleanup up to a hook App mounts unconditionally. So opening a password-reset link in a browser that already holds a session erased the token from the URL while nothing had read it: the page loads, nothing is said, and clicking the link again does exactly the same, because the token is untouched and the session is still there. That is the dead end this epic exists to remove, and `main` did not have it — the strip used to live inside the card, which a signed-in visitor never renders. An unspent reset fragment now stays, which restores the recovery that shape always had: signing out reloads with the fragment intact and the form is waiting. Once the card has spent the token a later reload meets S4's named dead-link screen, which is true. The affirmative version — a banner telling a signed-in visitor that reset links open in a signed-out window — is logged with DX-15, along with the `hashchange` half that still only recognises `#verify=`. |
||
|
peter
|
563fa0513d |
fix(auth): close what the epic's own review found (E9.5 review round 1)
Eleven findings survived adversarial verification; these are the fixes.
**Address pre-emption.** S1 dropped the approval-time password revoke, arguing `password_login`
refuses an unverified account before it reads `is_active`. Two verifiers showed that holds only
while the address stays unverified — and S6's approval mail exists to get the real owner to end that
state, at which point the squatter's password works. While an address is unverified the NEWEST
registration now owns it: the password is replaced and every outstanding verify token deleted, so
the owner takes the row back simply by registering, and a link already in flight cannot confirm it
for anyone else. The residual (an owner who confirms and neither registers nor resets) is logged as
SEC-16 beside SEC-15, where the re-attestation path it needs already lives. The comments that
asserted the old, false invariant now say what actually guards this.
**The entry URL.** S2 moved `clearEntryUrl()` out of the signed-out auth card into a hook App mounts
unconditionally, and it blanket-stripped the whole query string, the fragment and `history.state` on
the FIRST commit. That broke first-run setup outright — the wizard mounts only after its query
resolves and then finds no `?token=` — and silently ate `?link=`/`?oauth=` (no toast, no refetch
after connecting Google), `?v=`/`?chan=` deep links, and scroll restoration. It now clears only the
fragment and the two one-time flags it owns, and preserves `history.state`.
**The env allow-list.** S3 canonicalised the Invite branch of `is_allowed` and left the
ALLOWED_EMAILS/ADMIN_EMAILS fallback matching literally — the 2026-09-03 lockout with a different
source of truth, plus a shadowing trick where an unauthenticated request under a sibling spelling
permanently masked an env grant. Canonical on both sides now, and the same for the delete dialog's
warning and the ADMIN_EMAILS role bootstrap.
**Honest states.** `send_invitation` stamped "I already wrote to them" before a fail-soft background
send; it sends inline and records only what left. The admin-side resend answered `{ok: true}` for a
dropped mail; it now says so. Both also activate/serialize consistently with the other decide paths.
**Correctness sweep.** The 7-day approval link said "expires in 168 hours" — durations render in
days once there is more than one. `_register_account`, `upsert_pending_invite` and `add_invite`
picked among canonical siblings with no ORDER BY and no exact-spelling tie-break, so which account
got the re-send, and whether a denied row was reopened over a pending one, was up to Postgres.
`purge_user` deleted every canonically-equal invite, revoking a surviving sibling account's access.
`ConfirmProvider` wrapped its ReactNode message in a `<p>`. Approving no longer leaves the
stuck-sign-ups list stale. The refusal panels announce and take focus.
**Tests.** Three mailers rewritten this epic never rendered in any test; every `send_*` now renders
in both languages. The orphan-key guard could not fail (it scanned the catalog that defines the
keys) and had no reverse direction. Newly pinned: canonical activation, the surviving sibling's
grant, a failed invitation and resend, an expired reset link, a throttled login's silence, the
per-language admin fan-out, and that the entry URL keeps what it does not own.
|
||
|
peter
|
e5997ca567 |
fix(auth): consume a verification token that arrives without a page load (E9.5 S2)
Found in UAT. Navigating a tab that already runs the app to a URL differing only in the fragment is a same-document navigation: nothing reloads, so the import-time entry snapshot never sees the token. It sat unconsumed in the address bar and the previous outcome stayed on screen -- the same silence this sprint set out to remove, wearing a different hat. Pasting the emailed link into a running tab does exactly this, and our verification mails were plain text until 0.78.8, which makes pasting the normal way to use one. A hashchange listener now picks up the new token, the guard tracks consumed tokens rather than a single fired flag (still exactly one POST per token), and a fresh link clears the standing outcome instead of leaving the old banner up. |
||
|
peter
|
c134b514c1 |
fix(auth): confirm an emailed verification link wherever it is opened (E9.5 S2)
The token was only ever consumed inside Welcome.tsx, which App renders ONLY when there is no session. Opening the emailed link in a browser that already held a Siftlode session posted nothing, the fragment was then stripped, and the user got no signal at all -- the link simply did nothing. Incognito worked, which is why it survived. Confirmation now happens in App, above that branch: signed out the outcome still drives the auth card's banners, signed in it drives a top-of-app bar. The entry URL is snapshotted once at import time (lib/entryUrl) instead of per component, so no future URL writer can strip a token before whoever needs it has read it -- that ordering race is what broke this in the first place. POST /auth/verify now names the address it confirmed, which matters when the browser holds a session for a different account; the same reasoning as password_reset_required already covers the disclosure. Also here, from the 2026-09-02 review tail: the dead GET /auth/verify goes (both senders emit the fragment form, and the last query-token link expired 24h after the 0.78.7 deploy), a spent #verify=/#reset= fragment is cleared while signed in, and the auth-card banners get role=status. The verifyOkReset copy no longer blames admin approval, which E9.5 S1 made false. |