e23128b4a130566263f61052bd490953c1c44f87
7
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 peter
|
10c0ca4cf7 |
feat(email): write to people in their own language (E9.5 S7)
Twelve mails carried hardcoded English while the app itself has enforced HU/EN parity since E5.
A mail is the one user-facing surface nobody can re-render by switching the UI language: it arrives
once, in whatever language we picked, and stays that way. That made the epic's own headline mail —
"one mail, one click" — English for a Hungarian reader.
The text moved to a catalog (`mailtext.py`) with a `text(key, lang, **vars)` renderer, and the parity
rule is now a test rather than a habit: every key must carry both languages AND the same
`{placeholders}`. A translation that drops `{link}` sends a mail with no link in it; one that invents
a placeholder raises inside a background task nobody is watching. Both are silent in production.
Every `send_*` takes the language as its second argument, resolved by the REQUEST handler and never
inside the mail — these all run as background tasks, after the request's session is gone, which is
the same reason the approval mail computes its link in the handler.
Where the language comes from, in order: the account's own preference; failing that, the language the
person asked us in; failing that, English. The middle one is new — `invites.lang`, migration `0082` —
because the mails an access request produces go to an address that usually has no account yet, and
the signal does exist: the page their form was submitted from, or the locale Google reported for a
sign-in we refused. Captured rather than derived, for the third time in this epic (`google_email` in
S3, `preferences.language` in S6 taught the same lesson): a signal that exists only in one moment
cannot be backfilled later. So the admin is asked in exactly one place — the invitation to an address
they typed in themselves, where nobody has ever told us anything.
That send is now a dialog rather than a bare click, which is also where the "you already wrote to
them" warning belongs — it used to live only in a tooltip the admin may never hover, guarding the one
action whose failure mode is mailing a real person twice.
S6's registration `lang` field turned out to be dead on arrival: the backend accepted it, the
frontend never sent it, so every account has been storing nothing. The request builders now stamp the
UI language themselves — a signal that has to be passed in by every caller is one every caller can
forget, which is exactly how it shipped unset.
Admins are notified one mail per language group instead of one blast to everyone. They are people
with their own UI language; a single message would have to pick one of them and be wrong for the rest.
Also removes a duplicated `invited_at` column declaration on `Invite` (two identical definitions
landed in S6).
|
||
|
peter
|
b1086e05dc |
fix(auth): stop drawing a reset form the link can no longer fill (E9.5 S4)
Reported from UAT: delete an account, then open its password-reset link. The card drew the full "set
a new password" form — because a `#reset=` fragment was present, and nothing more — and only after
the user had typed a password did the server answer 400. Measured first: no security hole. A user's
tokens cascade away with the row, so nothing can be set on a deleted or a re-created account. What
was left is a dead end of exactly the kind this epic exists to remove, and it is not rare: a reset
link lives one hour, mail is slow or lands in spam, and whoever got two mails clicks the older one.
password-reset/check answers whether a link is still usable WITHOUT spending it, so asking can never
cost the user their one real attempt — the property the tests pin hardest. It gets its own limiter,
because opening a link must not eat the budget for requesting one, and a throttled caller is told
"ok", never "dead": this check may only ever save someone a wasted form, so when it cannot answer it
degrades to the old behaviour instead of declaring a live link finished. The confirm endpoint stays
the authority, and its failure raises the same named screen, since the token can die between the two
calls or the probe itself may have failed.
A too-short password is deliberately NOT that screen. The length check runs before the token is
spent, so a typo costs the link nothing, and the card tells the two 400s apart by `reason` so only
one of them takes the form down.
Both email-link confirmations (verify, password-reset/confirm) now answer in the {code, reason}
shape S4 introduced. They were the last refusals a user meets by simply clicking an old link while
still being answered in hardcoded English under a bilingual UI. The seven remaining bare strings in
this module (register, request-access, the demo guards, set-password) sit behind client-side
validation the UI does first; they are logged as a follow-up rather than swept in silently here.
One bug found by the UAT itself, in the new code: the check went out FOUR times per opened link —
StrictMode double-invokes effects and the shell remounts the card as the session probe settles.
Harmless per request, but against a per-IP limit it would exhaust the budget in two reloads and then
silently fall back to drawing the form unchecked: nothing errors, the feature just stops working.
Deduped in a module-level map holding the in-flight promise (a ref dies with the remount that causes
it); a failed probe drops itself so a blip is never cached as "dead". The test renders the card
twice, because with one render the guard would rot undetected.
UAT on localdev: the reported scenario end to end (delete the account, open the link) shows the named
screen and no form; a live link still opens the form and completes; the CTA lands on the request-a-
link form; one probe per opened link. Throwaway accounts removed.
|
||
|
peter
|
ed91c83dd7 |
fix(auth): name the state and the address behind a refused sign-in (E9.5 S4)
"Your account is awaiting admin approval." was true and useless. It never said WHICH mailbox the account was on, and on 2026-09-03 that silence hid a Gmail alias mismatch for a day: a registration as np.temu@gmail.com met a Google claim of nptemu@gmail.com, and every screen in the funnel agreed to say nothing about it. Every refusal password-login can answer with now uses the codebase's structured {code, reason} detail, built in one helper. The three that arrive AFTER the password is proven carry the address on the account plus both gate flags; the two that answer before it (invalid, rate_limited) carry nothing, so a wrong password and an unknown account stay byte-identical. The frontend renders the first three as a named screen in place of the form — there is nothing to retype once the password is correct — with an icon, the two-gate checklist, the address in monospace, and a resend CTA where one helps. Reporting each gate from its own flag is the payoff of S1: approved-but-unverified is a real state now, and a screen that assumed a sequence would send that user off to wait for an admin who has already decided. The Google access-request notice names the address too, and says so when the request was already on file under ANOTHER spelling of the same mailbox — the honest version of "we didn't open a second one", stated only when it applies. It moved from the query string to the fragment: the notice now carries an address, and a query string lands in every reverse-proxy access log. Same reasoning that put the verify/reset tokens there, and the same owner already clears it. urlencode, not an f-string, because URLSearchParams reads a bare + in a fragment as a space and would mangle exactly the +tag addresses this epic exists to protect. upsert_pending_invite returns the row it settled on beside the is-new flag, since the row's stored address is what the notice has to name and what mail will go to. Deviation from the PendingScreen mockup, deliberately: no "Sign out" button and no separate "Not your address?" link. The mockup drew the panel in the app shell; the accepted decision (a) keeps the pending user session-less, so there is no session to end, and the address is named directly above a "Back to sign in" that answers the same question. UAT on localdev, both languages: all three refusals with the typed spelling deliberately differing from the stored one (the panel named the stored one), the resend CTA carrying the typed address into the resend form, and both access-request banners with a +tag address surviving the fragment round trip. Throwaway accounts and the language switch reverted. |
||
|
peter
|
c134b514c1 |
fix(auth): confirm an emailed verification link wherever it is opened (E9.5 S2)
The token was only ever consumed inside Welcome.tsx, which App renders ONLY when there is no session. Opening the emailed link in a browser that already held a Siftlode session posted nothing, the fragment was then stripped, and the user got no signal at all -- the link simply did nothing. Incognito worked, which is why it survived. Confirmation now happens in App, above that branch: signed out the outcome still drives the auth card's banners, signed in it drives a top-of-app bar. The entry URL is snapshotted once at import time (lib/entryUrl) instead of per component, so no future URL writer can strip a token before whoever needs it has read it -- that ordering race is what broke this in the first place. POST /auth/verify now names the address it confirmed, which matters when the browser holds a session for a different account; the same reasoning as password_reset_required already covers the disclosure. Also here, from the 2026-09-02 review tail: the dead GET /auth/verify goes (both senders emit the fragment form, and the last query-token link expired 24h after the 0.78.7 deploy), a spent #verify=/#reset= fragment is cleared while signed in, and the auth-card banners get role=status. The verifyOkReset copy no longer blames admin approval, which E9.5 S1 made false. |
||
|
peter
|
243869401a |
fix(auth): stop discarding a legitimate password on admin approval (E9.5 S1)
SEC-10 revoked any password set while an account's email was unverified, on both the Google-adoption and the admin-approval path. On the approval path that was redundant: password_login refuses an unverified account before it ever reads is_active, so approval hands a pre-emptor's password nothing it could use. All the revoke achieved there was destroying the password a legitimate registrant had just chosen -- and since the admin normally decides before the user reads their mail, 'your password was cleared for security' was the DEFAULT experience, not an edge case. The guard stays on the Google-adoption path, where the real owner does attest ownership. password_reset_required and the ok_reset banner stay: accounts stripped on prod before this change have no other way back in. Two existing tests pinned the old rule, so they are rewritten rather than deleted, and the SEC-10 recovery pack now builds the revoked state through the surviving producer. |
||
|
peter
|
3ac3d382e7 |
fix(auth): stop the address-bar mirror eating emailed auth tokens, and unlock revoked accounts
Two independent bugs made an email+password registration unrecoverable in prod. The verification link did nothing. urlWithParams/clearParams rebuilt the URL as pathname+query and dropped the fragment — but the one-time auth tokens ride the fragment (#verify=/#reset=, SB3), and the providers that mirror nav params (useUrlMirror in FeedFilters/Playlists/Plex/Channels) sit ABOVE the lazily-loaded <App> in main.tsx. Their mount effect replaceState'd the token away before the auth card's chunk had loaded, so the card read an empty hash: the link opened a bare sign-in page, no request, no banner. Both helpers now carry the fragment over. The account was then locked out for good. SEC-10 nulls password_hash when an unverified account is attested (here: admin approval landing before the user could verify — which the bug above made impossible). That is indistinguishable from a Google-only account, and reset eligibility keyed off password_hash alone, so no reset link was ever issued: no password to sign in with, and no way to get one. users.password_revoked_at records the revocation, reset eligibility honours it, and setting a password again (reset-confirm or set-password) clears it. An account that never had a password stays ineligible on purpose — its owner adds one from Settings. /auth/verify now also answers password_reset_required so the card can say why the registered password stopped working, instead of leaving the user at the uniform "Invalid email or password". Telling the holder of a valid verify token leaks nothing: they have already proved they own the mailbox. The 0078 migration backfills the stamp for rows carrying the exact lockout signature (local, non-demo, no password, unverified), so existing victims recover unaided. |
||
|
peter
|
8eb6f13288 |
refactor(api): extract account/auth/setup/admin; façade is now spread-only (R7.5 S2)
Move the last four inline domains out of lib/api.ts into per-domain slices, each owning its types + method slice. The barrel now holds ZERO endpoint logic and zero types of its own — it only re-exports core's HTTP machinery, re-exports each domain's types, and spreads the 15 slices into the single `api` object. A new endpoint therefore has nowhere to land but a domain module. The `api` shape and all call sites are unchanged (every req/beacon call byte-identical to dev; no method dropped, no key collision). |